I once worked with a company called Beyond Belief Media and I was supposed to help develop podcasts. I came up with an idea for a podcast but it was never developed. It might be too grandiose or out of your subject range but I will pitch it anyway. It's called Test your Faith, and essentially it's a more structured version of Politically Incorrect but dealing with belief systems as opposed to politics. It consists of several different representatives from varying belief systems, say an Atheist, a Buddhist, a Jew, a Muslim, a Taoist, a multi-spiritualist, a Darwinist, Agnostic, a Q.R.S.ist, or whatever. And if you wanted a more specific topic by a highly regarded rep. you could use someone from this category who has recently published a book (and they would probably want to be on your show to promote the book). But anyway, each podcast features a different belief system or aspect of that belief system, so lets say that the first podcast features a liberal Christian who just wrote a book called “I pick and choose the things I like out of the Bible and base all of my beliefs on them for some reason†and so that liberal Christian has say 10 min. to lay forth his belief system to the other panelists, then each panelist has an opportunity to ask him a question (in an attempt to show the fallacies of that belief system) and the liberal Christian answers them, this is followed by an open panel discussion (like politically incorrect) and is concluded by a brief end statement by each panelist leaving the featured panelist with the last word. What do you think?
No likey? If you no likey my idea I can recommend some guests.
Richard Carrier
Brian Flemming
Richard Dawkins
(who I can put you in touch with)
I would like to hear from Eckharte Tolle just because I heard he was good with open discussions
Oh I think I might be able to help with Sam Harris as well.
I helped Brian Flemming in the past (He made a documentary called The God Who Wasn't There) and he interviewed Robert Price, Sam Harris, Richard Carrier, Earl Doherty, and The Raving Atheist. I'm sure he knows how to get in touch with them.
He also interviewed Richard Dawkins.

How about Victor Danilchenko? One of the smartest people I know so far as retaining facts.

David Quinn wrote:I think Victor would make an ideal guest. But Dan Rowden tells me that he has a thick Russian accent, which might be a problem. Can anyone who has spoken to him confirm or deny this?
-

Katy wrote:I nominate Robert Larkin.
There's a girl on EZboard involved in the human genome project - it could be interesting to talk to women who are involved in science/philosophy/math/etc.

Elizabeth Isabelle wrote:Has Robert come back?
The female from the human genome project is very... feminine. Also, English is not her primary language, so I don't know what kind of accent she has.
Katy wrote:No, Robert is offline for a while. I suggested him mainly as a joke, anyway. I'd bet a lot that he wouldn't do it.

Elizabeth Isabelle wrote:He probably would if he can get these offline priorities taken care of, and he would be good, too.
Matt Gregory wrote:The thing is, I think you would have to build up some interest in the show before anyone will participate in it.
I'm not really sure how you'll accomplish that since your idea of relaxed pondering is pretty white-knuckled for most people, but I'm just thinking out loud.
Dan Rowden wrote:Matt Gregory wrote:The thing is, I think you would have to build up some interest in the show before anyone will participate in it.
Agreed. We've considered that which is why for a start we'll be talking with people we're certain will be interested from the get go. Naturyl, for example, has expressed interest. I'm sure someone like Dave Sim would appreciate the extra publicity.
One we have some casts up we can then start looking at those people who, as you suggest, will want to see an established format first.
We also need a name for the concept which may prove to be the hardest part of all!
I'm not really sure how you'll accomplish that since your idea of relaxed pondering is pretty white-knuckled for most people, but I'm just thinking out loud.
Surely we're not that scary!?
Dan Rowden wrote:Agreed. We've considered that which is why for a start we'll be talking with people we're certain will be interested from the get go.
Surely we're not that scary!?
Katy wrote:Dan Rowden wrote:Agreed. We've considered that which is why for a start we'll be talking with people we're certain will be interested from the get go.
My mother has said she'll talk to you as well. She is writing her phD thesis on gender and math in elementry school students.
Surely we're not that scary!?
Speaking as the new guy in town - you guys can be pretty intimidating.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests