Yeah, well he said it too ok?
the difficulty with lingo it automatically splits subject/object.
generate a lingo that avoids that seeker.
get cracking.
Consciousness vs. the Infinite
-
- Posts: 2336
- Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2012 12:23 pm
Re: Consciousness vs. the Infinite
Ok, I wasn't implying anything.Dennis Mahar wrote:Yeah, well he said it too ok?
A:Dennis Mahar wrote: the difficulty with lingo it automatically splits subject/object.
generate a lingo that avoids that seeker.
get cracking.
-
- Posts: 4082
- Joined: Thu Jul 29, 2010 9:03 pm
Re: Consciousness vs. the Infinite
Don't shout!A:
-
- Posts: 2336
- Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2012 12:23 pm
Re: Consciousness vs. the Infinite
Another case of lacking inherent quality, ^ that makes sense to you, but not me.Dennis Mahar wrote:Don't shout!A:
-
- Posts: 4082
- Joined: Thu Jul 29, 2010 9:03 pm
Re: Consciousness vs. the Infinite
(;
freedom to be
plenty of nothin'.
freedom to be
plenty of nothin'.
-
- Posts: 2336
- Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2012 12:23 pm
Re: Consciousness vs. the Infinite
To bask in.
- Kelly Jones
- Posts: 2665
- Joined: Wed Mar 22, 2006 3:51 pm
- Location: Australia
- Contact:
Re: Consciousness vs. the Infinite
You've just contradicted yourself. Since form and emptiness are both the non-dual, any form or duality (e.g. a perception of duality or of non-duality) must be the non-dual.Kunga wrote: Dualities are mispeceptions of the Non-dual.
KJ: No, they're not.
Kunga: Depends on what your definition of non-dual is .
Also, if something is non-dual, that, in itself implies it's nature is non-dual, so any perception of duality would be a misperception.
Also, if emptiness means that nothing inherently exists [everything is dependent on other causes for it's existence], form and emptiness are non-dual.
Form is Emptiness
Emptiness is Form
Re: Consciousness vs. the Infinite
Kelly Jones wrote:You've just contradicted yourself. Since form and emptiness are both the non-dual, any form or duality (e.g. a perception of duality or of non-duality) must be the non-dual.
Ok. You got me on that one. But there are really no contradictions if all perceptions [including a "misperception"], are non-dual.
misperception/perception = duality = non-duality
so all is non-dual....even misperceptions
oy vey
no right or wrong perceptions
all perceptions are conceptions
all are equally empty
- Kelly Jones
- Posts: 2665
- Joined: Wed Mar 22, 2006 3:51 pm
- Location: Australia
- Contact:
Re: Consciousness vs. the Infinite
No, you're making two mistakes there. (1) Perceptions aren't non-dual, they are made of the non-dual. They are actually dualistic in their nature, being forms. But all forms are parts of the whole, which is obviously nondual. (2) Contradictions remain contradictions, and non-contradictions ditto. Distinctions and dualities remain exactly themselves always, and don't suddenly become a mush of indistinctness. If you think so, you're being illogical.Kunga wrote:KJ: You've just contradicted yourself. Since form and emptiness are both the non-dual, any form or duality (e.g. a perception of duality or of non-duality) must be the non-dual.
Kunga: Ok. You got me on that one. But there are really no contradictions if all perceptions [including a "misperception"], are non-dual.
Internally contradictory. You spout these things like a canary, with no understanding of what you're twittering about.no right or wrong perceptions