but you are being hypocritical by criticising language in trying to say it
I'm not criticising language.
I'm distinguishing language.
It's a distinction that 'gets' language.
language is always/already splitting subject/object.
something is being said about something.
The Tao can't be spoken outright,
and yet enlightenment in relation to Tao is spoken into existence through deduction.
At the bus stop.
Bus is languaged to be late.
people irritated, impatient, angry, 'dominated by a condition'.
When I say 'empty and meaningless'
I say 'bus is late' is empty due to causes.
I say the emotional/psychological reaction to 'bus is late' is meaningless.