What does the phrase "the logic to existence" mean? I have no idea.
My view on this is that it involves always true observations such as the path of least resistance, which is the most fundamental observable CAUSE of change, or cause of causality for that matter.
For the path of least existence to be true then a form of universal “logic” exists in everything in terms of awareness of the relative power of what is affecting it, and its capability to in turn affect what it is affecting it.
One could even say the path of least resistance is the underlying cause of logic, as it is the primary acknowledgment of A and Not A. This universal recognition of A and Not A as a set is the first level of Information and without Information there could be no reason for non-randomness, thus causality would not exist.
In a sense the above statements are still faulty, as they involves 2 uncaused “magics” – A, Not-A ....and the resulting effect being the path of least resistance.And here I go off again into my own little world :)
With my Expanding Time-energy theory the path of least resistance and its necessary awareness of A and Not-A does not necessarily exist as a primary cause. This theory does not involve A and Not-A, but the continual evolutionary process of A1 expanding to A1-A2, A1-A2-A3, A1-A2-A3-A4, A1-A2-A3-A4-A5 ~ up to NOW, where each A does not “internally” change or ever diminish in any way, so there is no actual Not-A. Instead of Not-A there exists only that A1 is not the same as A1-A2 and so on, and thus information, non-sameness, is caused by relativity.
With this theory the path of least residence is not a preceding law that is a parameter of causality, and there is no need for any form of “degree of power awareness” between A1 and A1-A2 due to the fact that A1 has zero separation from A1-A2 – the whole thing is just one continuously growing infinity, and there is nothing outside of it for it to be aware of. There is just an intrinsic infinite duality of older time thus lesser and newer Time thus greater.
In things though this infinite linear path of growth is not pure, something has stirred the Totality pot and caused breaks in continuity, so that Time streams of different ages intermingle, resulting in massive differentiation across spatial areas. This is the result of each expansion of time creating a new linear stream, creating an infinity of time layers, which as a set results the non-linearity of the 3 dimensions + the 1 overarching linear dimension of times arrow (Time expands – never contracts, so is linear) in as per
A1 expanding to A1-A2, A1-A2-A3, A1-A2-A3-A4 ~
A2 expanding to A2-A3, A2-A3-A4, A2-A3-A4-A5 ~
A3 expanding to A3-A4, A3-A4-A5, A3-A4-A5-A6 ~
The only “magic” left is what causes time to expand. Well, if expansion of self is what it is, is all it is, then on what basis is there any need for it to be caused. It is not caused, as there are no externalities. As we all see that there at least one thing and/or one totality, then there is automatically a logical requirement for there to be an Infinity of some form behind that something. As infinity is essential then by default there can be no predecessor of nothingness, there can be no first creationary cause of the totality. There can only be a continuous first cause in a hierarchical evolutionary sense, meaning there must be continuous creation (expansion) that evolves into observable things). So in the end there is no magic in there not being a first cause, there is just our negative emotional reaction to the seeming logical disconnect between the fact that every Thing we observe does have a beginning and an ending (even where the these are by logical extension only, such as the beginning and ending of a black hole) and the fact that The Totality cannot have these attributes.