Are you saying you separate one from the other?
A doctrine it shouldn't be though,
I have a much better and more efficient idea, one far more satisfing: it is that from this moment I cease communicating with you.Alex, write up a rap sheet for me, I'll print it off, take it to the cops, insist they arrest me and lock me up. That should fix it for you.
Dennis Mahar wrote:MV,Are you saying you separate one from the other?
As a distinction.
Definitions are in knowledge.
Distinctions are 'gotten' from experience.
When you learn to ride a bicycle,
it's hard at first,
soon enough you 'get' balance.
Balance on a bicycle is 'grokked'.
It's distinguished.
A distinguishment or distinction.
Once you've distinguished 'appearance' from the normal run of seeing things as inherently existing...
You have that distinction,
not as knowledge, like something 'set in stone' or typeset in alphabetical order in an encyclopedia..
It's a way of being.A doctrine it shouldn't be though,
No, you're right.
If it became set in concrete for you then you would show up in life as a formula.
I don't talk about this stuff anywhere else.
It stays in the background as a distinction and when the bike starts to wobble it's remembered and balance is newly 'gotten'.
Very good, Dennis. The bicycle thing.
Enlightening the mind, so it rests effortlessly in Reality, doesn't happen overnight. It takes years of mindfulness, constantly applied day after day.
Just keep things simple. Focus your mind on the core truth of all life, namely, that all things are causally created and lack intrinsic existence. Then, from that position, let your mind roam naturally. Don't be too upset when you find yourself engaging in 'worldly temptations' and the like. It's your karma. It's nothing to be ashamed about. When you become aware again, just focus the mind on the core truth. Slowy, by force of habit, your mind will begin to centre on the nature of Reality, and this, in turn, will gradually alter your entire being.
cousinbasil wrote:Why you continue to cover for Cousinbasil/Brokenhead being two separate persons when even Cousinbasil hasn't come out and denied being Brokenhead.
I have denied it but you don't seem to want to hear that, which is fine with me, since it is fun watching you obsess. Life must be getting smaller and smaller for you, Roddy. I noticed that you continue to capitalize my alias, and so I checked and sure enough, you are deliberately doing the same thing with brokenhead. Yet you bristle when someone spells your name as "thomas." Let alone uses your real name "Roddy the Rank." If you were a thinker - which you are not - you would be a petty one, with foul moods and small ideas.
Tomas wrote:cousinbasil wrote:Why you continue to cover for Cousinbasil/Brokenhead being two separate persons when even Cousinbasil hasn't come out and denied being Brokenhead.
I have denied it but you don't seem to want to hear that, which is fine with me, since it is fun watching you obsess. Life must be getting smaller and smaller for you, Roddy. I noticed that you continue to capitalize my alias, and so I checked and sure enough, you are deliberately doing the same thing with brokenhead. Yet you bristle when someone spells your name as "thomas." Let alone uses your real name "Roddy the Rank." If you were a thinker - which you are not - you would be a petty one, with foul moods and small ideas.
Note the bolded words above...
and the below...
GENIUS FORUMS
Discussion of the nature of Ultimate Reality and the path to Enlightenment
.
GENIUS FORUMS
Discussion of the nature of Ultimate Reality and the path to Enlightenment
mental vagrant wrote:Amazing how petty these 'arguments' are becoming..
A flick of green to be seen between alone between two giants
mental vagrant wrote:Amazing how petty these 'arguments' are becoming..
Alex T. Jacob wrote:Well, I got it BAD! Quadrophrenia!
First, the tunes: this one goes out to Tomas.
June Carter, in my view, gets into your soul!
This one I dedicate to the Talking Ass...
We're working some heavy healings here, people! Stay with it...
Alex T. Jacob wrote:But Carl was mean...real mean. I am sunny & wonderful & lighthearted!
I am enjoying your many Biblical references. Check out the connection to Isaiah:"Prepare the table, watch in the watchtower, eat, drink: arise ye princes, and prepare the shield./For thus hath the Lord said unto me, Go set a watchman, let him declare what he seeth./And he saw a chariot with a couple of horsemen, a chariot of asses, and a chariot of camels; and he hearkened diligently with much heed./...And, behold, here cometh a chariot of men, with a couple of horsemen. And he answered and said, Babylon is fallen, is fallen, and all the graven images of her gods he hath broken unto the ground."
'Be a watchman on the tower..'
Tomas, if you 'win' here, what really will you have won?
movingalways wrote:A righteous man does not live by reason, but others may call him a reasonable man. A man of reason, however, is not necessarily a righteous man. A reasoning man believes he has found the "right" cause, and builds his world from that point onward, drawing others into his web of karma or self righteousness. A righteous man lives not by reasoning, but by the directives of his conscience, which knows nothing of a "right" cause, but only of doing the right thing for the sake of his salvation or liberation, and only for his salvation or liberation.
A first cause cannot and will not, ever be found. This is the truth the man who wants or needs to find a cause, usually so he can find temporary relief from his suffering of guilt or shame or confusion, refuses to acknowledge.
Human wisdom may be about being a man of reason, but wisdom of the consciousness that transcends and sustains everything human is about being righteous while being human.
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 0 guests