mental vagrant wrote:Movingalways, lol. Got to laugh at your signature when contemplating this 3 legged argument.
So you give me the one-legged argument, which, of course, is no argument at all?
Not an argument contribution. Simply observing an incongruity between signature and writings. I thought you might appreciate the irony.
mental vagrant wrote:Not an argument contribution. Simply observing an incongruity between signature and writings. I thought you might appreciate the irony.
movingalways wrote:mental vagrant wrote:Not an argument contribution. Simply observing an incongruity between signature and writings. I thought you might appreciate the irony.
Since you did not explain why you believe there is an incongruity between my signature and my writings, and I do not believe there is an incongruity between the two, how can I appreciate what you believe is irony?
Can anyone make sense of it?!?! The answer, of course, is 'No'. I think this just has to be stated. Generally when one states it, they go silent for a moment. 'How can the infidel challenge us so?' runs through their little heads. 'We speak Grand Truths that are True Medicine!'
Dennis Mahar wrote:The self is real (conventionally true, i.e., it exists in a dependent reality along with everything else we derive from experience)
The self is not real (ultimately true, i.e., it has no essence)
The self is both real and not real (conventionally real but ultimately unreal)
The self is neither real nor not real (neither ultimately real nor completely nonexistent).
That's the logic.
I' (we?) are causèd to appear here, Dennis, but were we ever really here? Not here and yet here we were never here or away. Examine 'exit' and tell me When did 'exit' really occur? Show me that border. Only the observer, subjectively, designates. Never being here and never left, never 'me' but never 'you', what shall the non-disappearing Ass be askèd to do? Coming, yet I am never there. Leaving, yet I enter stage left. Great Sage or Homer Simpson? Donkey extraordinaire or irritating derrière? Neither, all: I and We still have a ball...
Talking Ass wrote:Diebert wrote: "Are you perhaps just looking for anything to add to your clumsy semi-intellectual assassination attempts? It's rather embarrassing."
Note the characterization, as if I am 'assassinating' anyone (and as if I've ever run from self-embarrassment!) I am in fact bringing to the surface a whole range of material, observation and (potential) fact that y'all syuff under the mutherfucking rug! Genius Forum is a game, largely, that is played not in honesty but through deceptions, image-management, false-appearances: all that can be summed up precisely in those videos we are referring to!
Why you continue to cover for Cousinbasil/Brokenhead being two separate persons when even Cousinbasil hasn't come out and denied being Brokenhead.
Talking Ass wrote: But that isn't what I asked, Diebert, I didn't ask for some stock definition, I asked for you to reveal in your own self the destructive effect of nihilism and the symptomology of decadence.
Genius Forum is a game, largely, that is played not in honesty but through deceptions, image-management, false-appearances: all that can be summed up precisely in those videos we are referring to!
When our ideas are bound up in our self-deceptions and our lies at that fundamental level, all our creations are marred. The solution: to begin to be honest.
postmodernese.... is a means of expression that is distasteful, to me anyway. (But interesting).
...and what you also deny and refuse to examine) produces another form of sickness!
Users browsing this forum: Yahoo [Bot] and 2 guests