What is the role of reason? Necessity.
movingalways wrote:Form arises and dissolves into the formless.
isn't this all just egotistical fuckery ?
Blair wrote:What caused you to have this idea..?
Kunga wrote:isn't this all just egotistical fuckery ?
Blair wrote:Blah, blah, blah
What caused you to have this idea..?
Dennis Mahar wrote:What is the role of reason? Necessity.
When you say Pam knows Pam.
What has to be in the background is intelligibility.
As the basis upon which Pam is intelligible to Pam.
Intelligibility would be the reason Pam knows Pam.
Familiarity is there too.
When you say ignorance is the cause of belief in causality you are using causality.
Diebert van Rhijn wrote:movingalways wrote:Form arises and dissolves into the formless.
There, you've just given "forms" a cause and an effect. It's also this thing you've invoked: the formless.
Then you must also arive at the conclusion that the formless is an illusion and as well the idea of anything arising out of such: all ignorance too!
But that would mean your "why" is just as illusive as "causality"! But you did bother anyway, you still preferred it over "goebligob" for some reason.
Bob Michael wrote:Blair wrote:What caused you to have this idea..?
Could it be the product of a mind that's 'movingalways'? A mind that's incapable of being still, being quiet?
Kunga wrote:isn't this all just egotistical fuckery ?
Diebert van Rhijn wrote:Kunga wrote:isn't this all just egotistical fuckery ?
Yes, but only the moment someone inserts herself, blocking the view.
Dennis Mahar wrote:isn't this all just egotistical fuckery ?
Pam's 'will to power'?
Metaphysical domination of Reason?
valiant attempt.
Dennis Mahar wrote:isn't this all just egotistical fuckery ?
Pam's 'will to power'?
Metaphysical domination of Reason?
valiant attempt.
movingalways wrote:Kunga wrote:isn't this all just egotistical fuckery ?
If you have to ask, you do not know.
Diebert van Rhijn wrote:Kunga wrote:isn't this all just egotistical fuckery ?
Yes, but only the moment someone inserts herself, blocking the view.
movingalways wrote:The formless is not a 'thing', it is a word to suggest forms that are not interpreted by the ignorance of the human mind that believes that truth and causality are one and the same 'thing.' The cause of causality cannot be known; this is why it is called Ignorance.
Since the formless is not a 'thing', but a suggestion that it is the realm of consciousness wherein forms are not seen, I do not arrive at the conclusion that the formless is an illusion. That which is not born or does not die is the reality of every form.
Kunga wrote:Diebert van Rhijn wrote:Kunga wrote:isn't this all just egotistical fuckery ?
Yes, but only the moment someone inserts herself, blocking the view.
lol.....maybe the view needs to get naked ...
all phenomena is causes/conditions, pieces and parts, thinker with a thought and a thought with an object,
all depend for their existence.
emptiness.
It is the breakthrough.
Sheer intelligence.
May as well get familiar with it.
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 1 guest