Rip my (most recent) theory to pieces.

Discussion of the nature of Ultimate Reality and the path to Enlightenment.
Sazar
Posts: 19
Joined: Tue Apr 05, 2011 5:02 am

Rip my (most recent) theory to pieces.

Post by Sazar »

Thought or awareness as a force akin to gravity.

A person's "spirit" is the absolute center or origin.

His will pulls reality together, through the ether, creating the illusion of mass.

His senses are actually dimensions.

Physical "laws" are simply fields, or webs holding the aspects of the manifested "reality" together.

In this the individual can create as much or as little variety as he wishes.

The spirit is rooted in one metaphysical position and does not "move" or "transition".
Only it's manifestation changes.
jufa
Posts: 841
Joined: Sun Dec 06, 2009 11:17 am
Contact:

Re: Rip my (most recent) theory to pieces.

Post by jufa »

I will tell an open ongoing secret I discovered when I shed my "rose colored glasses.". There is nothing, nothing, nothing in this world of material matter more real, more important, or more powerful, which activates the Law of God in the life of all men than that which comes out of their mouths. "God is no respector of person."

God's Law assures "God will perform that given us to do," What He/She/It has purposed and intended for us in saying "Let there be." God's Law is the Law of Gravity. Gravity in the sense of "you reap what you sow. . .cast thy bread upon the water, and after many days it shall return,"for It is the Spirit of the Principle Substance and Pattern Essence which governs the avenues all forms must, I repeat, must take according to the principle and pattern of the word spoken out of man's mouth. It is the Gravitational Law which holds the universe and all elements within the universe in the pattern principle of their purpose and intent of kind, The law which performs that which is purposed to do according to the order of Gravities Oracle of Obedience.

God's Law of Gravity is really "the Law of the Spirit of life." It is the Spirit of life man gives to all word thoughts he speaks which activates The Law and makes sure nothing can escape the pattern of words finalized in their kind The Law has principled Living Life, and eliminates the influence of anything that is not of its own kind. That which is of man's kind, that which man acknowledge and accept as real is relativism.

Relativism which form only objective pictures of imagined images, thoughts of fictitious forms, thinking on patterns of selfishness, manipulation and reciprocal eternal dualism. This is the subjectiveness which relativism of man's words produce and which the Law of Gravity cannot release from the eternal world of man's relative worlds of dualism until man's repent from his pictures, images, thoughts and thinking he temporary exist within. .

Never give power to anything a person believes is their source of strength - jufa
User avatar
Blair
Posts: 1527
Joined: Wed Jul 13, 2005 2:47 pm

Re: Rip my (most recent) theory to pieces.

Post by Blair »

Sazar wrote:Thought or awareness as a force akin to gravity.

A person's "spirit" is the absolute center or origin.

His will pulls reality together, through the ether, creating the illusion of mass.

His senses are actually dimensions.

Physical "laws" are simply fields, or webs holding the aspects of the manifested "reality" together.

In this the individual can create as much or as little variety as he wishes.

The spirit is rooted in one metaphysical position and does not "move" or "transition".
Only it's manifestation changes.
Well, no not really.

There is no center to anything in an absolute sense.
cousinbasil
Posts: 1395
Joined: Sat Apr 10, 2010 8:26 am
Location: Garment District

Re: Rip my (most recent) theory to pieces.

Post by cousinbasil »

Blair wrote:There is no center to anything in an absolute sense.
Not only that, but in modern cosmological models there is no center to everything in an absolute sense.
User avatar
Blair
Posts: 1527
Joined: Wed Jul 13, 2005 2:47 pm

Re: Rip my (most recent) theory to pieces.

Post by Blair »

Well let's not confuse the poor schmuck.

no center to anything is fine.
jufa
Posts: 841
Joined: Sun Dec 06, 2009 11:17 am
Contact:

Re: Rip my (most recent) theory to pieces.

Post by jufa »

There is no center for anything; there is no center for everything because there is only the Center. The Center can only be the object of the subject because it is the Source of everything and anything.

Never give power to anything a person believes is their source of strength - jufa
User avatar
Blair
Posts: 1527
Joined: Wed Jul 13, 2005 2:47 pm

Re: Rip my (most recent) theory to pieces.

Post by Blair »

Well nah, not so much what you are saying spaz.

There is no center, period.
jufa
Posts: 841
Joined: Sun Dec 06, 2009 11:17 am
Contact:

Re: Rip my (most recent) theory to pieces.

Post by jufa »

Blair wrote:Well nah, not so much what you are saying spaz.

There is no center, period.
Then there could not be a beginning.

Never give power to anything a person believes is thei source of strength - jufa
Sazar
Posts: 19
Joined: Tue Apr 05, 2011 5:02 am

Re: Rip my (most recent) theory to pieces.

Post by Sazar »

What there's no center? There's no nucleus?

You sure bros?
User avatar
Blair
Posts: 1527
Joined: Wed Jul 13, 2005 2:47 pm

Re: Rip my (most recent) theory to pieces.

Post by Blair »

jufa wrote: Then there could not be a beginning.
There wasn't.
jufa
Posts: 841
Joined: Sun Dec 06, 2009 11:17 am
Contact:

Re: Rip my (most recent) theory to pieces.

Post by jufa »

Blair wrote:
jufa wrote: Then there could not be a beginning.
There wasn't.
If there was no beginning what then are you? Does that mean you are the ass because you have no beginning? Evidence speaks louder than mere words. If you can't give evidence, tighten your grippers so you will stop DODOing all over this thread.

Never give power to anything a person believes is their source of strength - jufa
User avatar
Blair
Posts: 1527
Joined: Wed Jul 13, 2005 2:47 pm

Re: Rip my (most recent) theory to pieces.

Post by Blair »

jufa wrote:If there was no beginning what then are you?
The infinite.
Sazar
Posts: 19
Joined: Tue Apr 05, 2011 5:02 am

Re: Rip my (most recent) theory to pieces.

Post by Sazar »

the infinite what?
User avatar
Blair
Posts: 1527
Joined: Wed Jul 13, 2005 2:47 pm

Re: Rip my (most recent) theory to pieces.

Post by Blair »

the infinite time to get your ears cleaned out, shitweasel.
Pam Seeback
Posts: 2619
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 10:40 pm

Re: Rip my (most recent) theory to pieces.

Post by Pam Seeback »

Blair, the moment I put my fingers to the keyboard to respond to a post on this board, I am the beginning point, I am the centerpoint from which my thoughts flow forth. Every thinking being is a centerpoint of their own subjective-objective world, none of which is exactly the same as another in any given moment of thinking of "what is so, for me, right now." If this is not so, then would not thought come totally garbled and fragmented to the receiver, rendering him unable to know what he is purposed to know, unable to do what he is purposed to do?
User avatar
Blair
Posts: 1527
Joined: Wed Jul 13, 2005 2:47 pm

Re: Rip my (most recent) theory to pieces.

Post by Blair »

No.

When you put fingers to keyboard, you are forming a part of the infinite chain of causality, it only begins with "you" in your puerile mind, because you fail to comprehend infinity.

Not your fault though, having the inane mindset in common with the jufa loofah.
Elizabeth Isabelle
Posts: 3771
Joined: Tue Sep 05, 2006 11:35 am

Re: Rip my (most recent) theory to pieces.

Post by Elizabeth Isabelle »

Blair wrote: When you put fingers to keyboard, you are forming a part of the infinite chain of causality, it only begins with "you" in your puerile mind, because you fail to comprehend infinity.

Not your fault though, having the inane mindset in common with the jufa loofah.
Blair, the Ultimate's Anti-Dalai Lama
User avatar
Blair
Posts: 1527
Joined: Wed Jul 13, 2005 2:47 pm

Re: Rip my (most recent) theory to pieces.

Post by Blair »

He's a shit-turd.

Oh no, I've created bad karma for myself!
Pam Seeback
Posts: 2619
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 10:40 pm

Re: Rip my (most recent) theory to pieces.

Post by Pam Seeback »

Blair wrote:He's a shit-turd.

Oh no, I've created bad karma for myself!
What the Dalai Lama thinks is what he thinks, what you think, is what you think. And what you think is individualized to you. You are the causality of you. How this effects/affects you, I have no idea. That is on you.
User avatar
Blair
Posts: 1527
Joined: Wed Jul 13, 2005 2:47 pm

Re: Rip my (most recent) theory to pieces.

Post by Blair »

Go fuck yourself you idiotic fuckwad.

"You are the causality of you" ehe, ehehehe.

"How this effects/affects you, I have no idea" That's right, you have no idea.

I'll give you a clue though; you are an absolute fucking moron.
User avatar
Diebert van Rhijn
Posts: 6469
Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 4:43 pm

Re: Rip my (most recent) theory to pieces.

Post by Diebert van Rhijn »

All thought is being, all thought is origination, all thought is consequence. Only when seeing this the power and responsibility of truth is grasped in one fell swoop.
Sazar
Posts: 19
Joined: Tue Apr 05, 2011 5:02 am

Re: Rip my (most recent) theory to pieces.

Post by Sazar »

@ Blair

So you think everything is already set in motion, and that you have no choice in any matter?
That all choices are Illusions based on the idea that causality is leading everything a certain way,
everything is a snowball effect, and will power is just another illusion?
User avatar
Blair
Posts: 1527
Joined: Wed Jul 13, 2005 2:47 pm

Re: Rip my (most recent) theory to pieces.

Post by Blair »

Ass.
Sazar
Posts: 19
Joined: Tue Apr 05, 2011 5:02 am

Re: Rip my (most recent) theory to pieces.

Post by Sazar »

Then know this padawan.
You're consciousness could very well be unfolding in a manner analogous to
the concept of causality. Assuming, consciousness itself is not malleable.

This, in effect, is perfectly in line with my above stated theory.

Owned.
cousinbasil
Posts: 1395
Joined: Sat Apr 10, 2010 8:26 am
Location: Garment District

Re: Rip my (most recent) theory to pieces.

Post by cousinbasil »

Sazar wrote:Assuming, consciousness itself is not malleable.
What do you mean by malleable?
Locked