Cristabe wrote:Do Women Combat Pilots justify the cost of training and is it acceptable for a country to have Women POW's in case of enemy action? Women by their nature are not aggressive and they might have to think about starting a family etc., thus cutting short their combat careers.
Cristabe wrote:Women by their nature are not aggressive
On my planet the women are the more aggressive and mean species.
Animus wrote:I guess men are more likely to punch a woman, and with that there is a significant threat of fatally injuring the woman. On the other hand, women like Bobbitt are going to take a knife to the man's body and cut him into pieces
Animus wrote:Evidently, you haven't looked very closely at african female behavior in urban projects.
cousinbasil wrote:Animus wrote:Evidently, you haven't looked very closely at african female behavior in urban projects.
If you did not mean African-American, perhaps you should have at least capitalized African. However, anyone who has lived in such an urban environment understands what you mean.
One other thing, animus - you should make it clear when you are quoting something - until I clicked on the link in your last post, I thought you were saying the things in it.
jupiviv wrote:The squadron(an all-women one) didn't survive the war either, as it was dissolved in 1947/48, so obviously they weren't seen as important.
Cristabe wrote:Do Women Combat Pilots justify the cost of training and is it acceptable for a country to have Women POW's in case of enemy action? Women by their nature are not aggressive and they might have to think about starting a family etc., thus cutting short their combat careers.

Elizabeth Isabelle wrote:...are they adequately interchangeable for men in that position? Why should men do all of this type of work if a female is equally good?
Cristabe wrote:Do Women Combat Pilots justify the cost of training and is it acceptable for a country to have Women POW's in case of enemy action? Women by their nature are not aggressive and they might have to think about starting a family etc., thus cutting short their combat careers.
Note: This is not a male chauvinist question and not meant to degrade women.
Just inviting some discussions with regard to military careers only.
mensa wrote:A woman is as good as any man at anything,
mensa-maniac wrote:I've kept shut all my life on two things and haven't uttered a word to anyone.
mensa-maniac wrote: I know I could keep shut. I've kept shut all my life on two things and haven't uttered a word to anyone.

Animus wrote:mensa-maniac wrote:I've kept shut all my life on two things and haven't uttered a word to anyone.
What things are those?
Elizabeth Isabelle wrote:mensa-maniac wrote: I know I could keep shut. I've kept shut all my life on two things and haven't uttered a word to anyone.
By saying that much, you have proven that you are not fit for top secret clearance.
Animus, you know that not all females are the same. There are politically incorrect generalizations that may have some validity (not saying that is the case in this instance) but the opportunity should be there for females so that the door is open for those who are qualified, and if that is the appropriate path for them.
menses-maniac wrote:What I know is of no significance to anyone!
cousinbasil wrote:menses-maniac wrote:What I know is of no significance to anyone!
As you have aptly demonstrated countelss times here at GF.
mensa-maniac wrote:cousinbasil wrote:menses-maniac wrote:What I know is of no significance to anyone!
As you have aptly demonstrated countless times here at GF.
Mensa says: You're very mean to say that to me. Go Fuck yourself!
So Blair and Cousinbasil, stay away from my posts if you think I haven't anything to contribute
I have more to contribute than any of you fuck heads. All you contribute is your nastiness and meaness which is no where near genius.
cousinbasil wrote:I have more to contribute than any of you fuck heads. All you contribute is your nastiness and meaness which is no where near genius.
Just for the record, I may be a fuck-head, but I am not a mean or nasty fuck-head.
And let's not get too wrapped up with this genius classification. I know there has been much back-and-forth at GF about what the term means in this venue or in general.
The only contributor that appears to approach what the term is held to mean here is Solway, IMHO, due largely to his consistency of thought, at least as it appears in his PFTH, which I take to be quite the minor masterpiece. But again, I cannot back that up - it is only an opinion.
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 1 guest