Dennis Mahar wrote:Why do you make it mean bot?
Dennis Mahar wrote: If I take an expression from here or there that shows up as a perfect expression in the context of a project I'm undertaking...
Dennis Mahar wrote:Is it shameful?
Is it a crime?
Dennis Mahar wrote:Ugly is as ugly does...
who made it ugly.
Dennis Mahar wrote:Are you being a smartarse?
Carmel wrote:Do whatever you want...I just feel don't comfortable feeding what often appears as a "WOMAN" obsession/addiction.
Also, it's like prince once said...you'll be over all this when you're 35. It's just the stage you're at,(hopefully) perhaps the younger people here would like to engage in further gender discussions with you. That's fine, but don't take it personally that I find them to be redundant and boring.
Dennis Mahar wrote:I will pull anything I deem as a perfect expression out of the 'global brain' that fits in a conversation that is undertaken as a possibility for transformation.
Dennis Mahar wrote:You meant to cause harm Bobo. I didn't.
Trust me Bobo.
Dennis Mahar wrote:Love me without condition as I love you.
Kelly Jones wrote:I think it's highly unfair for people to use Prince's tendency to let damaged emotions influence his behaviour to be some kind of example of anything related to this forum; particularly unfair on him. It's unfortunate that he has let himself regress into that stuff, but it cannot be held against him or anyone else. Such things are difficult to overcome, and it'd be better if he took a break from the forum to deal with it.
Dennis Mahar wrote:This is fact.
I KNOW that I exist. I do not KNOW that you exist. This basic ‘truth’ is the same for everyone – but I cannot prove it. You can prove it for yourself. You do not believe that you exist – You KNOW that you exist. And in that ‘small fact’ there is everything you need to know.
Dennis Mahar and Suki wrote:There is certainty of only ‘your’ own experience. Everybody else’s ‘experience’, is a subset of your own. It will be only an assumption, to assume that ‘everybody’ else is also experiencing in the same way. You can never know ‘others’ experience, only your own experience. Then you must ask how many ‘I Am’s', are there? And how many Awareness’ are there? If you are honest, you will verify or rather self-verify that there is only one. Your own.
Give this careful consideration! As the implications are staggering……
Dennis Mahar wrote:You are taking a stand on the question of private property Bobo.
And judging from that.
There are dualistic 'stands' on the question of private property.
On the question of private property, uncertainty arises.
Therefore you are standing on uncertain ground.
Come home Bobo.
Dennis Mahar wrote:Only I Am is certain.
How are you figuring "I am" is a necessary element?
prince wrote:Would you mind not defending me with your patronising, insular, "not wanting to be tarred with the same brush" comments?
You Kelly, are small-fry, and genuinely mentally-ill to boot.
It's not your place (figuratively or literally) to request me to leave. Get over yourself.
Kelly Jones wrote:Can you refrain from the vicious kind of language that characterise your posts? Just a request from a fellow member of the forum..
Users browsing this forum: Baidu [Spider], Bing [Bot], Exabot [Bot] and 1 guest