Bubblefish wrote:yet mystery remains none the less.
ksolway wrote:Bubblefish wrote:yet mystery remains none the less.
Saying that something is a mystery is really a contradiction in terms. Since if you know that something is necessarily mysterious, as opposed to something which might one day be understood, then you are claiming some sort of absolute knowledge, which is the exact opposite of mystery.
prince wrote:yes it's all a big MYSTERY!!
what a presumptuous dumbass.
Saying that something is a mystery is really a contradiction in terms.
Since if you know that something is necessarily mysterious, as opposed to something which might one day be understood, then you are claiming some sort of absolute knowledge, which is the exact opposite of mystery.
Really, it couldn't be said in any simpler terms.
As Dan somewhat recently pointed out, it is astounding to see how something as simple as A=A can get so complicated.
the dialectic is INCLUSIVE of the observer to the phenomena. It is irrelevant if one object is truth and then mystery to another, ALL ideas and aspects of environment morph from mystery to true and false, all the time.
DavidQuinn000 wrote:Babblefish wrote:
You're merely describing what is going on in your head - and nothing more.
This is probably the core reason why most people here don't find your ideas all that interesting.
Arresting though they might be inside that head of yours, here in the outside world your ideas are flat and lifeless.
They don't excite the intellect, they don't go anywhere, they don't go under the surface of things and reveal the nature of Reality with any penetration or incisiveness.
In short, they are boring.
I just hope I never see the words "true", "false" and "mystery" in the same sentence ever again.
God have mercy on us all.
Leyla Shen wrote: [/b]
Your dick might be bigger than mine, but mine has the stuff after which potency is named...
Leyla Shen wrote:Wank, wank, fucken wank.
See, I donâ€™t swallow -- never have.
Nor do I measure my potency by the number of people who suck my dick.
[Plays El Sariri - vihuela, panpipesâ€¦]
[Cracks her heels rapidly against the floorboards, twisting her skirt left and right.]
Rrrrrrrrrr-eee-ha! Wah-ya-ya-ya, yi-ya-ya-yaaaa.
Suck your own cock, mate.
prince wrote:There's no mystery to where your concept will end up - in a year or two, in the trashcan, so to speak.
It's rubbish mate, it has no value in the broader context, only to such lads as yourself who don't know what the hell is going on, upstarts who think they have all the answers.
Mystery can be defined as simply what you do not know yet.
Those who know the answers won't give them to your project, you are creating an insulated circle, limited in quality and scope by the limits of your current understanding.
I hear a scottish accent. hmmm, yet no hits from Scottland on the list. Interesting. I guess yer one of them 'down under' people, eh?
How do you measure your potency? Surely not by rational tit for tat debate, because so far, both you, DQ and a few others here potency gets all super tiny in simple honest exchange. And who cares?...
Um, that's not how it works...
DavidQuinn000 wrote:Well, I think you're too easily caught up in his theological upstream to be unbiased in this matter. I personally find his ideas too boring to give any sustained attention to, and hence I pulled out of that discussion after a short while. -
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 2 guests