David Quinn wrote:You don't think that the anti-SJW crusaders are doing the same thing? Of course they are.
No, they're not trying to do it by force
, which the authoritarian left are trying to do.
You don't see anti-SJWs trying to forcibly shut down feminist talks, like you do see militant leftist groups trying to forcibly shut down people like Milo, by smashing things up, lighting fires, and hitting people with sticks - even when they are unconscious on the ground.
Not only are they trying to impose their values on everyone else
It's not "imposing" when you spread your values in a civilized way, using the processes of democracy and persuasion.
but they are quick to brand anyone who opposes them as “evil", “dishonest”, “dangerous”, “liars, etc.
I don't think they are "quick" to do it, but they are, for the most part, entirely justified.
For example, Dan attempted to represent me as having never agreed with any of Trump's views. That is definitely dishonest and misleading, and I demonstrated that was the case.
You tried to represent me as not caring about Trump's views on the environment, even though I have repeatedly said, many times, that I don't agree with his views on the environment.
You also said that Breitbart was white supremacist
("far right"), even though you admit that, for you personally, "it's a grey area". [or a black
area most likely]
Dan says that all people who supported Trump instead of Clinton, in the face of what Trump says, are "deluded and insane and no other sensible judgement is possible
In addition, you have continually appealed to the fallacy of guilt by association.
These are all clear cases
of dishonesty (or inability to think - I'm not sure which).
SJWs do all these things, unendingly.
They are even trying to shut down educational institutions.
Can you give me an example of anti-SJWs trying to shut down educational institutions. I haven't seen that.
All I'm aware of is that some people think the government should not provide funding for some of the social sciences, such as gender studies. If people want so-called "gender studies" then they'll have to pay for it out of their own pocket. That's not anywhere close to "shutting down" institutions - even in part.
They are every bit as tyrannical as the SJWs themselves.
Show me where anti-SJWs are forcibly
trying to stop SJWs from speaking, and I might think you have a point.
For thousands of years, religious fundamentalism has suppressed the truth far more pervasively and violently than left-wing advocates ever will.
You obviously don't know about communist regimes around the world. They have performed pretty much every evil you will ever see in religion, if not more.
And yet Kevin Solway has somehow seen fit to team up with these very same fundamentalists
Once again you are using the logical fallacy
of guilt by association.
If I wanted to be equally as illogical as yourself then I could say that you are teaming up with the SJWs and communists.
You are also teaming up with the fundamentalist Islamists, who are on your side.