jupiviv wrote:Pincho Paxton wrote:Actually the theory of everything is accepted in Wikipedia, and by science as a way to explain everything from a few simple concepts. As in, what makes everything, what made the Universe.
A lot of things are accepted in wikipedia and science. That doesn't mean all of them are right.
As I said, you can't explain everything from a concept, because a concept excludes something
by definition. There's the concept, and everything else except that concept(infinity - concept, if you will). If you try to say that aether creates the universe, you'll automatically have to find out what created aether. And even then, you can't be sure that what you're observing is actually aether, and not orange juice.
Anders Schlander wrote:'if real physics' means causation, the computer simulation is caused by real physics, and generates real physics(effects), meaning, 'physics' 'is' the nature of things and corresponding change.
Why should physics be causation? Physics, like all science, deals with other causal chains around us as they appear to us.
But.... saying that things are the product of a 'simulation', is just aswell as saying the universe as most people think of it, is made by god.
I think David was speculating, rather than stating a fact, in order to make the point that the current state of affairs are not
necessarily so, as we can think of other states of affairs.
There's only one law in physics which I consider to be absolute - the 1st law of thermodynamics. In any situation, energy must be transferred from one object to another. This is because an object is doing work by default when it exists, and so must have energy. However, I don't think scientists would go that far, since they don't venture into philosophy.
Orange juice is Aether.. everything is. here is some of my evidence for this Planck scale Aether....
1) The flow of planck is visible in Dark Matter as is flows in streams, and speeds up gravity in distant Galaxies, because Planck is Gravity.
2) Planck creates light, and waves as it is compressed to the point that it breaks. It's light is visible, like in the sun, a nebula, and the two slit experiment, and the waves are also heard in large arrays, and Pulsars (which are a result of the flow of plank dragging in larger material.).
3) Planck creates spin as it spins inside Black Holes, it's spin results in an increased flow of material travelling towards the black holes. the spin is observable in Magnetism, Relativity, Black Hole film footage, The Bose Einstein Experiment, the clocks of two planes flying around the Earth in opposite directions, hot air rising, aircraft, photosynthesis.
4) Finally Planck is used by the brain, and this is observable in the Observer experiments like the two slit experiment, and sight, hearing, and thought itself.
I probably have about 100 other examples, but apart from the examples there is the actually configuration of the Universe to consider. The kissing problem that creates snowflakes for example, and the fact that nature is a fractal created from this problem. The fact that you have to use this fractal to place pressures in the Universe to create the correct configuration of Galaxies, and stars.
Apart from all of those examples you have to use a bit of logic. Absolute Nothing can't create a Universe, there is nothing to work with. The closest thing to nothing is 1. You need the building block of 1 to create 2. Basically zero is a Black hole, and 1 is the Planck. Being as planck needs to move, it has to move through the only space available to 1 which is zero. So planck has to move through black holes. But the holes are a result of planck being crushed. When you look at the forces resulting from the kissing effect of crushing, you get the correct shapes forming the Universe.
This alters science a lot. Black holes have no pull at all, but the planck rushing into them creates a current that you can be dragged along with.
Planck rushing into the holes of the Earth press us down.