Ball feeding
Posted: Sat Jun 11, 2005 3:32 am
Screw the hackers already.
One advantage to the 'ho house is we never discuss anything of value so it don't matter that they gone.
Woogy boogy nigga, know what I mean?
Anyway, I just saw this report on breastfeeding on the CNN. The gist of the thing was that some people are offended by seeing a woman feed her baby.
How phobic can you get?
I am not sentimental about it. I don't consider it to be some kind of beautiful act. But a kid's gotta eat and a hungry baby is like a rabid tiger. Nobody in his right mind would not feed a hungry baby. It's a matter of self defense; self preservation.
I don't get why feeding a baby is offensive. Some man said it's like urinating in public. Personally, I have nothing against peeing and pooping in the streets except for the filth.
But feeding a baby does not deposit human waste in the streets. It is not a health hazard.
I realize that Americans are very prudish but damn. Get over it. Mothers are encouraged by their pediatricians and obstetricians to breastfeed. Human milk is the best thing to feed humans.
I do realize that breasts are considered to be secondary sexual characteristics. So, I am trying to imagine if I would feel disturbed if testicles had nipples and seeped milk and men ball fed kids.
Preposterous idea, I know, but same principle.
I think that I would have the masculine ability to compartmentalize the concept. In a sexual encounter, I might find balls interesting and attractive. But, if a man opens up a special flap in his jeans and commences to feed his child, I would envision his balls in a different light.
Of course, the comparison between boobs and balls is silly. A crotch is a lot closer to the anus than the chest.
I do not get how breastfeeding is offensive.
Any explanations?
Faizi Edited by: MKFaizi at: 6/10/05 10:35
One advantage to the 'ho house is we never discuss anything of value so it don't matter that they gone.
Woogy boogy nigga, know what I mean?
Anyway, I just saw this report on breastfeeding on the CNN. The gist of the thing was that some people are offended by seeing a woman feed her baby.
How phobic can you get?
I am not sentimental about it. I don't consider it to be some kind of beautiful act. But a kid's gotta eat and a hungry baby is like a rabid tiger. Nobody in his right mind would not feed a hungry baby. It's a matter of self defense; self preservation.
I don't get why feeding a baby is offensive. Some man said it's like urinating in public. Personally, I have nothing against peeing and pooping in the streets except for the filth.
But feeding a baby does not deposit human waste in the streets. It is not a health hazard.
I realize that Americans are very prudish but damn. Get over it. Mothers are encouraged by their pediatricians and obstetricians to breastfeed. Human milk is the best thing to feed humans.
I do realize that breasts are considered to be secondary sexual characteristics. So, I am trying to imagine if I would feel disturbed if testicles had nipples and seeped milk and men ball fed kids.
Preposterous idea, I know, but same principle.
I think that I would have the masculine ability to compartmentalize the concept. In a sexual encounter, I might find balls interesting and attractive. But, if a man opens up a special flap in his jeans and commences to feed his child, I would envision his balls in a different light.
Of course, the comparison between boobs and balls is silly. A crotch is a lot closer to the anus than the chest.
I do not get how breastfeeding is offensive.
Any explanations?
Faizi Edited by: MKFaizi at: 6/10/05 10:35