11.9.2001: An attempt to imitate Pearl Harbor ?

Post questions or suggestions here.
Post Reply
cansouth
Posts: 2
Joined: Fri Apr 28, 2006 7:31 am

11.9.2001: An attempt to imitate Pearl Harbor ?

Post by cansouth » Fri Apr 28, 2006 9:45 am

Here is what I think happened the 11.9.2001:

There were five planes remote controlled by Israels secret service organisation Mossad. NORAD (North American Aerospace Defense Command) managed to shoot down two of the five planes. There were arab terrorists in each plane, but they did never control any of the planes, because Mossad controlled the planes by remote control, maybe by using a satellite.


1. Flight 11 hit one of the Twin Towers
2. Flight 175 hit the other Twin Tower
3. Pentagon was hit not by a passenger plane, but by a smaller plane, also this remote controlled. See picture under.

Image

4. Both Flight 77 and Flight 93 were shot down over the Atlantic Ocean, and the planes disappeared in the ocean.



The goal for Flight 77 and Flight 93 were american navy ships in the Atlantic Ocean.

Image



This to create a terror act which reminds of Pearl Harbor. The suicide pilot attack against Pentagon would also have reminded about Pearl Harbor.

Image Pearl Harbor illustration



One film about Pearl Harbor was released in May 2001. It could be a coincident, but it could also have been timed on purpose close to 11.9.2001, to help to create Pearl Harbor emotions for the US-citizens.


http://www.cinemasavvy.com/p/pearlharbormovie.html
Pearl Harbor Movie

Produced By: Jerry Bruckheimer Films & Touchstone Pictures

Release Date (US): May 21, 2001


President Bush sometimes, or often, compare 11.9.2001 with Pearl Harbor.

http://edition.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS ... sh.speech/
June 3, 2004
Bush made no mention of the election, instead reaching back to cast ongoing conflicts in historic terms. He compared the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks to the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor, which precipitated U.S. involvement in World War II.





NORAD shot down both Flight 77 and Flight 93. Those two planes were the last passenger planes to end their travels, while the planes which hit Twin Towers were the first two planes. NORAD was not able to react quickly enough to the first two passenger planes, but NORAD had time to react against the two last passenger planes.

If all five planes had hit their intended targets, then the Bush government would probably have admitted it, including that the Pentagon building was hit by a plane smaller than a Boeing passenger plane. But the government would still have blaimed arab terrorists, even if Bush knew all the planes were remote controlled.


If Flight 77 and Flight 93 were shot down over the Atlantic Ocean, then the persons on board were maybe still alive after the planes had hit the bottom of the ocean. The water could then slowly have entered and filled up the planes so the persons on board drowned. Maybe some of the persons on board also paniced. With other words, a terrible death.

That could be the motive for Defence Minister Donald Rumsfeld and other persons in Pentagon to lie about what happened to Flight 77 and Flight 93. They want to spare the relatives and families to those who were on board, from a terrible truth. The lie is probably well meant.



A very good article about Flight 77:
http://judicial-inc.biz/Dov_Zakheim_Fl_77.htm

A very good website about 11.9.2001:
http://thewebfairy.com/killtown/index.html

User avatar
sschaula
Posts: 1317
Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2005 3:16 am
Location: USA
Contact:

Post by sschaula » Fri Apr 28, 2006 1:14 pm

Why don't you go post this at some extremist political forum?

MKFaizi

Post by MKFaizi » Fri Apr 28, 2006 2:02 pm

I think this is real enlightened stuff and should be posted on Genius proper. People who post down here are too low IQ for this crap. This stuff is meant for the enlightened trio. Requires the Solway touch.

Faizi

User avatar
Diebert van Rhijn
Posts: 6469
Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 4:43 pm

Post by Diebert van Rhijn » Fri Apr 28, 2006 9:09 pm

It's no secret there are several connections between Pearl Harbor and 9/11. Only there are no remote controlled planes needed to understand the tragic similarities.

"...the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event – like a new Pearl Harbor." - from "Rebuilding America's Defenses", page 51, by PNAC in September 2000 (which included Cheney, Bolton, Libby, Rumsfeld and Wolfowitz).

If later analysis of the Pearl HArbor incident (like in the book Infamy: Pearl Harbor and Its Aftermath by John Toland or see here) is correct then there was no 'surprise' attack and was the event 'invited', some pieces sacrificed, to get the war going. Only a few decision makers would have been in the know.

Wars do not 'happen' in this last century, they are mostly wanted, 'set up', by all parties involved. War is what mankind wants, war is what mankind gets.

MKFaizi

Post by MKFaizi » Sat Apr 29, 2006 1:22 pm

Can't this spam be deleted?

Free speech is one thing. Spam is spam.

Faizi

MKFaizi

Post by MKFaizi » Sat Apr 29, 2006 2:46 pm

CANORTH -- FUNNY AS HELL.

YOU DON'T HAVE TO CALL ME DARLIN, DARLIN
YOU NEVER EVEN CALL ME BY MY NAME

HAJI S'HAJI MUHAMMAD IL MAST BGHALLI ICK

GET OVER IT.

BEGUM FAIZI

MKFaizi

Post by MKFaizi » Sat Apr 29, 2006 2:47 pm

ABIDA PARVEEN.

Faizi

Post Reply