The Brothel

Post questions or suggestions here.
Post Reply
User avatar
Matt Gregory
Posts: 1537
Joined: Tue Jun 07, 2005 11:40 am
Location: United States

The Brothel

Post by Matt Gregory » Thu Apr 20, 2006 1:42 pm

Hey, who changed the name of the forum? Someone's getting pussywhipped around here...

User avatar
Matt Gregory
Posts: 1537
Joined: Tue Jun 07, 2005 11:40 am
Location: United States

A possibility

Post by Matt Gregory » Thu Apr 20, 2006 1:44 pm

Hmm, I think it might be related to this article I was reading.

Greg Shantz
Posts: 147
Joined: Sun Jul 07, 2002 8:20 am

Post by Greg Shantz » Thu Apr 20, 2006 2:27 pm

Heh.

User avatar
Jamesh
Posts: 1526
Joined: Fri Jul 22, 2005 3:44 pm

Post by Jamesh » Thu Apr 20, 2006 3:10 pm

That article looks like the researchers used crap science to me.
$10 games and the simplesness of the game means fickleness in attitude.

Notwithstanding that however the end results I imagine to be quite realistic.

What tests like this show, imo, is that men are more emotional than women, and in evolutionary terms, it is this emotion that provides men with the mental tools to be creative in whatever way. It gives them the tools to concentrate far more deeply than women when there is something important to be considered. When nothing of importance or danger are present, then we fill up our heads with thoughts about sex because we have to be thinking about something.

User avatar
Matt Gregory
Posts: 1537
Joined: Tue Jun 07, 2005 11:40 am
Location: United States

Post by Matt Gregory » Thu Apr 20, 2006 3:56 pm

Jamesh wrote:That article looks like the researchers used crap science to me.
$10 games and the simplesness of the game means fickleness in attitude.
Not necessarily. The simplicity of the game could just be a technique of narrowing down the factors in the study.

Notwithstanding that however the end results I imagine to be quite realistic.

What tests like this show, imo, is that men are more emotional than women, and in evolutionary terms, it is this emotion that provides men with the mental tools to be creative in whatever way. It gives them the tools to concentrate far more deeply than women when there is something important to be considered. When nothing of importance or danger are present, then we fill up our heads with thoughts about sex because we have to be thinking about something.
I don't think that necessarily means men are more emotional in toto. I think the most conclusive thing the study shows is that men are more emotional about female beauty than they are about games.

User avatar
Kevin Solway
Posts: 2766
Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2001 8:43 am
Location: Australia
Contact:

Re: The Brothel

Post by Kevin Solway » Thu Apr 20, 2006 4:21 pm

Matt Gregory wrote:Hey, who changed the name of the forum? Someone's getting pussywhipped around here...
Of late there's been too much inapproprate material on the other forum, so I thought I'd experiment by changing the name of this one.

MKFaizi

Post by MKFaizi » Fri Apr 21, 2006 10:20 am

I think that was a sensible idea.

Faizi

MKFaizi

Post by MKFaizi » Fri Apr 21, 2006 11:11 am

more emotional about female beauty than they are about games.
I think there is some truth in that. But how much is Donald Trump distracted from The Deal by beautiful women? I know he is enamoured of female beauty but that did not stop him from making a couple of bucks here and there.

It is not my intention here to make small talk. I have only my own observations to go by.

When my kids were very young, I noted how males reacted to females and how the very presence of a female could bring chaos.

My daughter was about six and she was at a friend's house. I had four boys in the house, all sitting and lying about quietly on the floor playing a video game or watching a cartoon -- can't recall the exact circumstances. Very peaceful. Little boys interacting peacefully and in a sane manner.

Then, WHAM!! Rock comes in the back door.

All hell breaks loose. The boys are on their feet bouncing around like little Mexican jumping beans; gyrating. Fighting immediately breaks out. A barrage of flying cups and plates and game controls. Rock is in the middle of it, too -- beating crap out of her brother and the other three boys.

I can never forget that day because it had been so peaceful with just boys.

I always had tons of kids at my house. I never saw the thing happen in reverse. I never had a peaceful roomful of little girls. The girls were always lighting their Barbies on fire or blowing up their Spice Girls with firecrackers or sword-fighting.

In a roomful of little girls with a boy entering -- nothing stopped. Too noisy for the slam of the door to be heard.

I am surprised -- really -- that my son survived growing up with an older sister. He took his licks, certainly. Rock would not allow Buster to sing, for instance. I did my best to defend him but singing usually took place in the car. Because I was driving, it was difficult to defend him. He stopped even trying to sing and did not sing for about thirteen years.

Only now, his vocal cords are liberated. He has a good voice.

With females being so dominant early in life, it is surprising that men can later control them. Then, you have to look at the extremes that control must take -- the religiously enforced wearing of burquas and veils; the Taliban; corsets; girdles; laws that prohibit women from voting; marriage.

I am not saying that women should be controlled. Indeed, I think they should not. Because they have been controlled for so long, they need to get past their growing pains -- including favortism toward women in western courts. Above all, females need to free themselves from the control that they impose upon themselves; i.e; agreement to be controlled -- to be subservient.

The freedom of women entails the freedom of both sexes from the yokes of marriage and children and work only for the sake of work.

True liberation of women means full liberation of the human race. No one should be tied down by the obligations of sex.

Faizi

MKFaizi

Post by MKFaizi » Fri Apr 21, 2006 1:42 pm

Someone's getting pussywhipped around here...
Please, define pussy.

Who was whipped?

Faizi

User avatar
Matt Gregory
Posts: 1537
Joined: Tue Jun 07, 2005 11:40 am
Location: United States

Post by Matt Gregory » Fri Apr 21, 2006 5:10 pm

Marsha wrote:
Please, define pussy.

Who was whipped?
I was planning on making a big joke about it, but got bored with the idea before I could write more on it.

User avatar
sue hindmarsh
Posts: 1083
Joined: Mon Oct 24, 2005 9:02 am
Location: Sous Le Soleil

Post by sue hindmarsh » Sat Apr 22, 2006 12:41 am

Matt,

I don’t know where you where going to take the "pussy whipping" idea, but I think your line above is a great joke. Very Dave Hughesy! (Aussie comedian)

Sue

MKFaizi

Post by MKFaizi » Sat Apr 22, 2006 11:31 am

I think he whimped out. Claimed to be making a joke and getting bored in the process.

If I wrote something here and, then, claimed that it was only a joke -- well, I just don't think that would float. I would be called everything in the book -- drama queen, womanish, fragile, bipolar.

But, if Matt can get away with it, cool, I reckon.

I did not get the punchline.

Anyone mind explaining it?

Faizi

MKFaizi

Post by MKFaizi » Sat Apr 22, 2006 11:52 am

All right. I am starting to get it, I think.

Matt read the article about how men are distracted by beautiful women and, then, he felt pussy whipped.

Is that it?

In my very rural county, there is but one lone transvestite. God, she is gorgeous. Drop dead gorgeous. Slim. blonde. Dresses like a movie star. She managed to get breasts. Unfortunately, she could not afford the rest of the surgery so she still has a penis. I assisted in a pretend pap smear on her once.

Well, dick or not, she is the prettiest woman for miles around.

Distracts hell out of everybody.

Is the joke that men are distracted by fakery?

If so, then, what makes them men -- given their fragile emotional state and distractability?

Is that the joke -- that men are not different from women? That men are easily dazzled?

I still don't get it.

Faizi

jmack
Posts: 19
Joined: Mon May 01, 2006 4:27 am
Location: Deep South

Pussy whipping

Post by jmack » Mon May 01, 2006 6:02 am

I love this discussion.

There is an ad on TV for some bleach. It opens with a woman telling her friend to look over the fence at her neighbor, he is something amazing. And they look over the fence together. There is the man standing unclad but for a pair of white socks while he waters his lawn.

"How did he get his socks so white?" one woman asks the other. Her friend can't answer. That seems to be the onlly point of interest.

I told one of the women where I work that I thought that ad totally showed the difference between men and women. And she not only agreed she got other women to support her in this view. The conversation, much to my discomfort then degraded to what leches men are. All they want to see is (here followed a litany of names for naked body parts centered for the most part in the pubic and gluteal regions).

"A woman doesn't care what a man has, its what he does with it that is important," seemed to be the seminal comment from one of my female colleagues. I tried to change the subject, but they seemed delighted in burdening a male with the female gospel.

Post Reply