Philosophaster wrote:I doubt that most would. I linked them to provide "documentation" for anyone interested in checking out the truth of what I said.
Philosophaster wrote:What might motivate somebody to do something of this sort?
Elizabeth Isabelle wrote:That might work in most situations, but why would I want to post lies about myself?
Elizabeth Isabelle wrote:Philo asked a question, and I answered it sufficiently.
Elizabeth Isabelle wrote:Funny you should ask that right after deleting the thread in which I explained all that.
What's she [Cloudy] going to do? Lock me out so I can't talk to my "friends" anymore? It has already been established that I don't have any of those. Run a thread specifically for attacking me while throwing truth and logic out the window, and the justice of it is repeatedly "sticky buns" or some other such nonsense? Oh yeah, that's already been done. I know, she could show up on GF and start posting random attacks there, too - oh wait, done and done. Hey, maybe she could get some of her buddies to attack me too - and if I defend myself, she can accuse me of persecuting them! Oh yeah, she already did that, too - not that Rory wouldn't have done that on her own anyway... a person can't put that much effort into being two-faced without a personal interest in doing so.
Well, ignoring the nonsense didn't make it go away. Reason didn't work either. Since I'm hated anyway, I might as well demonstrate what these attitudes boil down to.
Of course there was a rule that if I didn't post futher, the attacks were supposed to stop - so I didn't, but the lies got bigger and bigger.
And what was the official response to uncalled-for attacks, lies, illogic, and broken rules?
You and your crew does not understand when spoken to logically - do you understand the picture review of the situation by posting ugliness and referring to it as "sticky buns" or do gross pictres mean more to you than how you treat actual people?
Elizabeth Isabelle wrote:This forum is not interested in Philo's girly attempt to start drama over here, and your thinly veiled attempt at trying to make it look philosophical is not going to work either.
Cory Duchesne wrote:You may have a problem with her over in your neck of the woods, but over here, she's not so bad that we need to start a thread about her, or ban her.
Unidian wrote:That's all well and fine, but as long as the mentally ill are going to be running rampant through our electronic living rooms, we have a problem.
I agree with you 100% that ideally, Elizabeth should be viewed as an object of compassion. Her behavior is clearly the result of a tortured mind. However, that does not mean we need to indulge such behavior, and frankly, I think it would be irresponsible of us to do so.
In my opinion, this situation should be ended at once with the removal of Elizabeth from the communities at which she is experiencing this conflict. That would be best for all concerned.
And for the record, she should also get out of this den of bizarre religious lunatics on the double if she has any interest in regaining her composure and sanity. Her discovery of this place has been her complete downfall - one only needs to examine her web site for evidence of that.
Cory Duchesne wrote:But instead, Philo and Katy, because they are unconscious of their addiction to the malice and drama, unwittingly try to get other people smoking the drugs - all the while congratulating themselves for being noble and just. It's a disgrace.
Cory: You may have a problem with her over in your neck of the woods, but over here, she's not so bad that we need to start a thread about her, or ban her.
Katy: Yes, but this has nothing to do with us.
It has to do with the fact that her post accusing you of idolizing QRS is pure projection.
She wouldn't want them to think less of her so she pretends to be all perfect here.
At any rate, Nat is right that we should have compassion towards the mentally ill. And that that includes Elizabeth. However, that doesn't give her an open door policy to attack me with impugnity, nor to attack my friends and their board. Eventually, we all run out of patience.
Cory Duchesne wrote:But that has nothing to do with the fact that I think lowly of the motives behind this thread and some of the attitudes over at FP and SW in general.
Philosophaster wrote:Cory Duchesne wrote:But instead, Philo and Katy, because they are unconscious of their addiction to the malice and drama, unwittingly try to get other people smoking the drugs - all the while congratulating themselves for being noble and just. It's a disgrace.
Nah, I just wanted to let people here know about Elizabeth's wise, worthwhile, and rational contributions to other boards.
Philosophaster wrote:Cory Duchesne wrote:But that has nothing to do with the fact that I think lowly of the motives behind this thread and some of the attitudes over at FP and SW in general.
Elizabeth made some rational and highly intelligent contributions to SW and I just wanted to share them and see what you guys thought.
Cory Duchesne wrote:Well, I think that your forums, FP and SW are not rational and highly intelligent. I think that they value the sorts of conditions that create the sort of problems you are having.
Users browsing this forum: Baidu [Spider] and 1 guest