Blair wrote:And you're an infected wart inside a hippos anus.
GodsDaughter1 wrote:Blair wrote:And you're an infected wart inside a hippos anus.
GodsDaughter says: Nope you're wrong Blair, that's not the answer, now lets see if you're bright enough to give an answer pertaining to the question!
Tomas wrote:GodsDaughter1 wrote:Blair wrote:And you're an infected wart inside a hippos anus.
GodsDaughter says: Nope you're wrong Blair, that's not the answer, now lets see if you're bright enough to give an answer pertaining to the question!
Well, Donna, we can see where Blair spends his time.
GodsDaughter1 wrote:How does Logic differ from Intuition?
If logic is a set of rules we follow by deductive reasoning, nothing stands in the way of intuition. Intuition is it's purest form of thought. So this tells me that logic is intuition in itself but deduced to rationalization.
GodsDaughter1 wrote:Tomas wrote:GodsDaughter1 wrote:Blair wrote:And you're an infected wart inside a hippos anus.
GodsDaughter says: Nope you're wrong Blair, that's not the answer, now lets see if you're bright enough to give an answer pertaining to the question!
Well, Donna, we can see where Blair spends his time.
GodsDaughter says: Yeah, his head is up the arse of that Hippo he's talking about. But, it's people like him that challenges my tolerance level, which is quite high. I've tolerated worse than him!
mental vagrant wrote:GodsDaughter1 wrote:How does Logic differ from Intuition?
If logic is a set of rules we follow by deductive reasoning, nothing stands in the way of intuition. Intuition is it's purest form of thought. So this tells me that logic is intuition in itself but deduced to rationalization.
Doesn't sound like you know what you are writing..
Dan Rowden wrote:Perhaps those arguing the significance of intuition - even its pre-eminence over reason - could define "intuition" for me in a purely intuitive fashion.
Dan Rowden wrote:You don't need to know the rules of deductive reasoning if your intuition is already 100% accurate (and you somehow magically know this to be so). In fact, you should already intuitively know the rules of deductive logic. Given that you don't, your intuition is automatically shown to be unreliable.
GodsDaughter1 wrote:Dan Rowden wrote:You don't need to know the rules of deductive reasoning if your intuition is already 100% accurate (and you somehow magically know this to be so). In fact, you should already intuitively know the rules of deductive logic. Given that you don't, your intuition is automatically shown to be unreliable.
GodsDaughter says: "In fact, you should already intuitively know the rules of deductive logic. Given that you don't, your intuition is automatically shown to be unreliable."
GodsDaughter says: I know intuitive knowledge, not the knowledge of the educators, which is a set of rules to deductive logic, if I was never educated in deductive logic, then how can I know their education in deductive logic, all I can know and be 100% accurate of what I know is what I know to be 100% accurate. What I do know is what it is not, that's all I know! And I do know that you are mistaken when you say my intuition is unreliable when I know it is 100% reliable always! When I make mistakes it's because I didn't listen to my intuition!
Tomas wrote:GodsDaughter1 wrote:Dan Rowden wrote:You don't need to know the rules of deductive reasoning if your intuition is already 100% accurate (and you somehow magically know this to be so). In fact, you should already intuitively know the rules of deductive logic. Given that you don't, your intuition is automatically shown to be unreliable.
GodsDaughter says: "In fact, you should already intuitively know the rules of deductive logic. Given that you don't, your intuition is automatically shown to be unreliable."
GodsDaughter says: I know intuitive knowledge, not the knowledge of the educators, which is a set of rules to deductive logic, if I was never educated in deductive logic, then how can I know their education in deductive logic, all I can know and be 100% accurate of what I know is what I know to be 100% accurate. What I do know is what it is not, that's all I know! And I do know that you are mistaken when you say my intuition is unreliable when I know it is 100% reliable always! When I make mistakes it's because I didn't listen to my intuition!
Not to step on your and Dan's conversation ;-0
Donna, we all have flashes of brilliance. That said...
Is it 100% accurate that you will die.
Is this deduced by logic, intuition, a combination of both, some of, or none of the above?
Users browsing this forum: Baidu [Spider], Google [Bot] and 0 guests