Certainly not as much as pot does.GD1 wrote:Has anyone ever heard of the flu changing one's chemistry?
GodsDaughter1 wrote: I can actually feel my body and mind healing.
Blair wrote:GodsDaughter1 wrote: I can actually feel my body and mind healing.
It's just a pleasant illusion. You've still got big holes in your brain that will never heal.
GD1 wrote:Marijuana depletes the body of vitamin C, so it's vitally important to replenish the body abundantly with it, so I drink a bottle of orange juice a few times a day.
cousinbasil wrote:GD1 wrote:Marijuana depletes the body of vitamin C, so it's vitally important to replenish the body abundantly with it, so I drink a bottle of orange juice a few times a day.
That's not well-thought-out.
Orange juice is a poison, albeit a relatively harmless one when compared to the other crap that people foist on their bodies. The vitamin C in OJ cannot be utilized by your body, because the co-enzymes of the orange have been stripped away. What OJ does is dose your body with fructose. That is a chronic toxin. It is like a beer without the buzz. Fructose can only be metabolized in the liver - the Coke Generation is cirrhosis waiting to happen.
Here's what to do, though. Split an orange into its little segments. Eat one segment every time you drink an OJ. Without the orange segment, your body uses almost none of the vitamin C in the OJ. By eating just one segment, you have the co-enzymes present when you drink the OJ. A co-enzyme - like any enzyme - is a catalyst. The presence of the catalyst makes the chemical process which requires one possible. The neat thing is that the catalyst comes out on the other side of the chemical equation intact. It is neither bound up in any compound, nor is it used up in any way. It is ready to act as a catalyst again.
Meaning, a little enzyme goes a long, long way. Unless you want OJ to be merely a poison by dosing you with fructose you do not need, eat a little orange slice with every glass of OJ. You will still be dosing yourself with fructose, but you will be replenishing your body's vitamin C.
cousinbasil wrote:Orange juice is a poison, albeit a relatively harmless one when compared to the other crap that people foist on their bodies. The vitamin C in OJ cannot be utilized by your body, because the co-enzymes of the orange have been stripped away. What OJ does is dose your body with fructose. That is a chronic toxin. It is like a beer without the buzz. Fructose can only be metabolized in the liver
Here's what to do, though. Split an orange into its little segments. Eat one segment every time you drink an OJ. Without the orange segment, your body uses almost none of the vitamin C in the OJ. By eating just one segment, you have the co-enzymes present when you drink the OJ. A co-enzyme - like any enzyme - is a catalyst. The presence of the catalyst makes the chemical process which requires one possible. The neat thing is that the catalyst comes out on the other side of the chemical equation intact. It is neither bound up in any compound, nor is it used up in any way. It is ready to act as a catalyst again.
Meaning, a little enzyme goes a long, long way. Unless you want OJ to be merely a poison by dosing you with fructose you do not need, eat a little orange slice with every glass of OJ. You will still be dosing yourself with fructose, but you will be replenishing your body's vitamin C.

1456200423 wrote:Do you have any refference of this? Where is this info from?
BTW @ OP. Pot is non-addictive. It's the tabacco, that is addictive.
ps. Quiter... ;-)
cousinbasil wrote:Here is a real eye-opener about fructose. It's long and quite technical in parts, but stick with it. It's solid science with far-reaching effects.

GD1 wrote:Since marijuana is non-addictive, why did the stuff inhibit me?
I''m getting things done now that otherwise wouldn't have gotten done--(suggestive reasoning) I''m thinking the stuff entertained my brain to the point of laziness, like cause and effect, but, if it's non-addictive, there wouldn't be any cause and effect. I smoked it, and there was no effect because it is non-addictive.
cousinbasil wrote:GD1 wrote:Since marijuana is non-addictive, why did the stuff inhibit me?
I''m getting things done now that otherwise wouldn't have gotten done--(suggestive reasoning) I''m thinking the stuff entertained my brain to the point of laziness, like cause and effect, but, if it's non-addictive, there wouldn't be any cause and effect. I smoked it, and there was no effect because it is non-addictive.
Not sure what you're saying here. Pot is non-addictive. That doesn't mean it doesn't have any effects, be they inhibitive, uninhibiting, or whatever. LSD clearly has effects, but it is non-narcotic and certainly nonaddictive.
I don't think you have personally gone through physical addiction, so you are hazy about what it means experientially. Put it this way, if marijuana were physically addictive, you'd still be using it. All these positive, glowing things you are relating about stopping would be gone, replaced with traumatic pain and discomfort which you would not want to write about. The discomfort would be short-lived, because you would soon succumb and use again. It would take many failed attempts a quitting before a successful effort took hold.

Unidian wrote:Now, the next question is, has David Quinn quit smoking the left-handed luckies, or is he still hanging out with Dad and rolling up blunts? Not judging, just curious why an enlightened Buddha would be getting baked.
Unidian wrote:Now, the next question is, has David Quinn quit smoking the left-handed luckies, or is he still hanging out with Dad and rolling up blunts? Not judging, just curious why an enlightened Buddha would be getting baked.


cousinbasil wrote: Pot is non-addictive. That doesn't mean it doesn't have any effects, be they inhibitive, uninhibiting, or whatever. LSD clearly has effects, but it is non-narcotic and certainly nonaddictive.
Unidian wrote:I see. Just going by the 'latest' information I was provided.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests