Jamesh wrote:My view is that the Isaelites have more propensity to understand truth, so why you give the slightest fuck about the so called Palestinians is beyond me. Economic death to all Muslims, until such time as they become more ameniable to less fundamental views is what I think is better for the human race. The % of Jews open to self-examination is far far greater than any Muslim society.
Why not just kill all people who have an IQ inferior to 110, before they reach reproductive age?
Which "Israelites"? The secular ones or the religious ones running the show?
Obama retook the oath that same day after 7pm, and it went smoothly that time, so wingnuts are left holding their dicks again.mansman wrote:(as an aside Fox is now suggesting perhaps Obama is not yet the actual president due to the blundered oath and may require court intervention!
Such are the enemies of the state, the extreme right, religionists, even willing to damage and weaken their own nation (further) if need be to maintain control- I kid you not, believe it!)
I suggest 130. That will leave my entire family in the clear, so we will have a much better shot as being the ultimate overlords; though a tighter competition too.Shahrazad wrote:Why not just kill all people who have an IQ inferior to 110, before they reach reproductive age?
Frankly, Jimbo, if you can't see the difference between those things you need an education, badly. If you have any semblance of knowledge of the history of the last 42 years of the occupied territories, and still maintain that view, then you are not a person whose ethics I can tolerate nor respect.
Australia would not be in the Israeli position to begin with.
Same gisly murder? well, if Mr. Silverstein considers killing terrorists to be grisly murder, he is within his rights -- but by the same token someone who fends off and kills an attacker is guilty of grisly murder, someone who defends his home from an foreign soldiers, killing them in the process, is guilty of a grisly murder...Tomas wrote:I propose that we from now on refer to Ehud Barak as Barak the Butcher. Let this stain whatever legacy he hopes to have for himself. Keep in mind this is a man who donned a woman's dress in order to assassinate his first terrorist in Lebanon. Mazel tov Ehud, you no longer wear a dress when you kill. Now it's a business suit. But it's still the same grisly murder. Barak to the Hague.
Deaths of innocents suck. Each innocent death is a tragedy. Each time an innocent dies, a whole universe of possibilities dies. There is no defense of that. There is, however, a reason for actions which brought this about -- and when people refuse to recognize that sometimes innocent deaths happen when good reasons are pursued, are indeed moral retards.At any rate, let the pro-Israel apologists view this image and come up with some foolhardy defense of this crime.
While it is true that Gandhi was murdered, it is also true that he accomplished quite a bit.It's very easy to proclaim your absolute commitment to non-violence. Turn the other cheek, do no harm, etc. Out here in the real world, people who do that are called marks -- or worse, victims; as often are those around them.
Indeed. However, there are extremely few Gandhis, men and women who are willing to lay their life on the line for their pacifist convictions, rather than merely claim those convictions.Shahrazad wrote:While it is true that Gandhi was murdered, it is also true that he accomplished quite a bit.
Users browsing this forum: Baidu [Spider] and 2 guests