Re: What is Love? Or did we do this before?
Posted: Tue Jun 16, 2009 8:32 am
Discussion of the nature of Ultimate Reality and the path to Enlightenment
http://theabsolute.net/phpBB/
Grab it by the balls. They're there.prince wrote:What is love?
It's a manifestation of our inner insecurity, inverted, projected outward.
A shared delusion is what it is. You love me with all my flaws, and I love you with all your flaws, and together we can get through this thing called life.
But the serpent bites to the last. It will get you too.
It's free. No debts.Shahrazad wrote:Romantic love sucks. It will come to an end and you will pay a price for it.
The price is attachment. Without attachment, there is no love.It's free. No debts.
But how does attachment manifest itself?Shahrazad wrote:The price is attachment. Without attachment, there is no love.It's free. No debts.
Without connection, there is no love. Freedom enhances connection, since you are more connected to yourself. Self is other; other is not Self.Shahrazad wrote:The price is attachment. Without attachment, there is no love.It's free. No debts.
Very interesting, and I can relate to this especially after Kevin's Weininger video. Very cool.Is. wrote:Nisargadatta says:
"When I see I am nothing,
that is wisdom.
When I see I am everything,
that is love."
I don't think love is an emotion. I think love is a drive.It may be that love itself is not an emotion, and that attachment is the emotion that love can predicate.
Let us assume that your lover has an affair with another man and falls in love with him. Let us also assume that you find out. Then we will be able to see how your attachment manifests itself.The love did not die or go anywhere. Where has the attachment been? Where is it now?
You are not answering either question, though. 1) Where has the attachment been? 2) Where is it now?Shahrazad wrote:Let us assume that your lover has an affair with another man and falls in love with him. Let us also assume that you find out. Then we will be able to see how your attachment manifests itself.bh wrote:The love did not die or go anywhere. Where has the attachment been? Where is it now?
Shah, you are just too funny. How about I use an even less disgusting example? Let's say she is masticated down to the gristle by a voracious army of red ants before my very eyes. Will I suffer?Or if you want, I can use a less disgusting example. Assume she dies after several years of lover bliss. Will you suffer? Or will you go on living your life as if nothing happened?
The fact is that this scenario already happened. She married someone else 27 years ago. I agree I went through a detachment phase, but my love for her remained.
The attachment grew gradually smaller as time elapsed, until it got to almost zero. You were not getting the positive effects of love that I talked about earlier in this thread, so the attachment part could not survive forever. Attachment goes hand in hand with the chemical stuff, like what your body produces when you jump from an airplane. The love that remained was really in dormant form - like the seed of a plant can stay dormant for years and not lose its potential.You are not answering either question, though. 1) Where has the attachment been? 2) Where is it now?
I make the assumptions because before you lose the object you are attached to, you may not realize you are attached. You seem to be in that position at this point.You are postulating a negative scenario. Why should we make your assumptions? I could assume I become horribly mangled in a highway accident this afternoon. I wouldn't like that. I can assure you I am more attached to being intact than I am attached to my lover.
There need not be if there doesn't seem to be much risk of losing the drug, I mean her.I am telling you it is different now. There is no anxiety that I could lose her to someone else.
I don't see how you can know this. Unless your love for this person is very low key, with no passion.If I did, it would not be anywhere near as stressful as the first time. It is as if I have been inoculated against the attachment part of love.
That is no answer at all. But if you would suffer, you know you were attached.Answer: I suspect I would feel whatever one feels in such a situation.
I don't get this. I have lived many years without romantic love, and I still have life memories. Good ones and bad ones, just like everybody else.Imagine your life without memories. Is that what we are after? I have avoided attachments for years. And I have the empty memories to show for it. My memory is like a large roll of film that has been exposed to light; there are no images on most if it so now it feels useless. Who knows how much film you get?
Why would you call bliss an encumbrance? What are you calling bliss?I am taking one day at a time and appreciating the human touch as it should be appreciated. And there is not much chance my life will become encumbered by bliss, for which I am grateful.
But you are negating the conscious mind's power to identify the sources of attachment, as you have just done, and thereby to deny it its mindless grip.Shahrazad wrote:The attachment grew gradually smaller as time elapsed, until it got to almost zero. You were not getting the positive effects of love that I talked about earlier in this thread, so the attachment part could not survive forever. Attachment goes hand in hand with the chemical stuff, like what your body produces when you jump from an airplane. The love that remained was really in dormant form - like the seed of a plant can stay dormant for years and not lose its potential.
The love is growing again, and I like your dormancy analogy. It is right on the mark. But if the attachment is also growing, it feels like a different kind of attachment.Your love is not dormant any more because you got your object back. The attachment is growing, either gradually or quickly.
And I can go with this analogy as well. Not all drugs are addictive or habit-forming, and the ones that are vary greatly in this respect.There need not be if there doesn't seem to be much risk of losing the drug, I mean her.
As do I - maybe here my own analogy failed. But I have friends and family in relationships, and while all of them have downs as well as ups, in some cases the ups vastly outweigh the downs. I have long envied those relationships. Yes, the men always think I have had it so good because I avoided the Tender Trap. There has never been any reason to disabuse them of this fallacy.I don't get this. I have lived many years without romantic love, and I still have life memories. Good ones and bad ones, just like everybody else.
If ignorance is bliss, all I am saying is that I have worked hard to rid myself of ignorance, and I always will.Why would you call bliss an encumbrance? What are you calling bliss?
Perhaps I just don't believe you can have the cake and eat it too. But it is possible that this is only because I have not been able to avoid attachment without avoiding the source. So maybe you can.But you are negating the conscious mind's power to identify the sources of attachment, as you have just done, and thereby to deny it its mindless grip.
The ones that aren't very addictive deliver very little in terms of highs. And vice versa.Not all drugs are addictive or habit-forming, and the ones that are vary greatly in this respect.
Your not finding what you wanted was an accident. And I never found someone who gets me. I guess conventional people have it much easier. Life sucks.I did not live so many years alone by accident, Shah. I simply did not find what I had always had with this woman, which is true friendship.
You don't take anything you read in the tabloids seriously, do you? Come on dude!brokenhead wrote: Angelina Jolie is a monster, both in films and from what I read in the tabloids that I devour, she is a menace to society and should probably be locked up somewhere. I hate her lips. It looks like she was trying to give a blowjob to an industrial vacuum cleaner.
Henceforth, I resolve to broaden my horizonsuncledote wrote:You don't take anything you read in the tabloids seriously, do you? Come on dude!brokenhead wrote: Angelina Jolie is a monster, both in films and from what I read in the tabloids that I devour, she is a menace to society and should probably be locked up somewhere. I hate her lips. It looks like she was trying to give a blowjob to an industrial vacuum cleaner.
Nicotine and alcohol are light-weight.Shahrazad wrote:The ones that aren't very addictive deliver very little in terms of highs. And vice versa.Not all drugs are addictive or habit-forming, and the ones that are vary greatly in this respect.
lol No one is conventional, truly. You just happen to know this about yourself.Your not finding what you wanted was an accident. And I never found someone who gets me. I guess conventional people have it much easier. Life sucks.I did not live so many years alone by accident, Shah. I simply did not find what I had always had with this woman, which is true friendship.
Yes, it is, Uncle Brokie.brokenhead wrote:I am reuniting with a former lover after many years, and I am moving out of state to do so. To Boise, Idaho, in fact. At the ripe old age of fifty-two, we have found each other via the Internet. In fact, I found her last Christmas Eve, and we have been exchanging emails like there is no tomorrow. I never stopped loving her, and yet I feel like I am falling in love all over again. Can this be possible? What do y'all think?
"I don't know how I can lose"brokenhead wrote:I am reuniting with a former lover after many years, and I am moving out of state to do so. To Boise, Idaho, in fact. At the ripe old age of fifty-two, we have found each other via the Internet. In fact, I found her last Chritmas Eve, and we have been exchanginging emails like there is no tomorrow. I never stopped loving her, and yet I feel like I am falling in love all over again. Can this be possible? What do y'all think?
You tell'm Donna. You should know Idaho sucks, big time! Shazammensa-maniac wrote:"I don't know how I can lose"brokenhead wrote:I am reuniting with a former lover after many years, and I am moving out of state to do so. To Boise, Idaho, in fact. At the ripe old age of fifty-two, we have found each other via the Internet. In fact, I found her last Chritmas Eve, and we have been exchanginging emails like there is no tomorrow. I never stopped loving her, and yet I feel like I am falling in love all over again. Can this be possible? What do y'all think?
With love you cannot lose, instead you choose!
Love never dies if two doves fly together!
When one dove lets go, the other dove can no longer fly, he longs for her return, "if it comes back it is yours, if it doesn't it never was"
"If you love something, set it free
If it comes back it is yours,
If it doesn't, it never was"
What is Love
A yearning
A burning, a desire to love
A feeling intense from the God above
The God within you, the feeling is grand
To love one another is the law of the land
Express it, receive it, accept it too
Responding to another is what to do
For they see a something inside of you
Similarities connect a couple of two
Intimacy is the level of love
You share with each other creating two dove
A two-way street where respect is earned
But when it is lost the dove is burned
An apology is needed and the love is returned
The dove are in love and the desire is yearned
GodsDaughter says: Quiet down children, Brokenhead didn't stir-up all the shit you created, what he has to say is not shit, it is a perfectly good to talk about love. Go for it Brokenhead, you've got nothing to lose in accepting her love and giving her yours. It takes two Dove to fly together, one is incomplete alone. That's why humanity and animals come in pairs--to go forth and multiply!brokenhead wrote:OK, that's fine by me. How is it that I am supposed to get humiliated? I make the move, my life turns to shit? My life is about to get better, you loser. I'll tell you what happens. You're on.prince wrote:I'm sure DQ can leave this thread as a humiliator of fuckwits exactly like you.prince wrote:I Can.brokenhead wrote:I don't see how I can lose.
Tomas wrote:You tell'm Donna. You should know Idaho sucks, big time! Shazammensa-maniac wrote:"I don't know how I can lose"brokenhead wrote:I am reuniting with a former lover after many years, and I am moving out of state to do so. To Boise, Idaho, in fact. At the ripe old age of fifty-two, we have found each other via the Internet. In fact, I found her last Chritmas Eve, and we have been exchanginging emails like there is no tomorrow. I never stopped loving her, and yet I feel like I am falling in love all over again. Can this be possible? What do y'all think?
With love you cannot lose, instead you choose!
Love never dies if two doves fly together!
When one dove lets go, the other dove can no longer fly, he longs for her return, "if it comes back it is yours, if it doesn't it never was"
"If you love something, set it free
If it comes back it is yours,
If it doesn't, it never was"
What is Love
A yearning
A burning, a desire to love
A feeling intense from the God above
The God within you, the feeling is grand
To love one another is the law of the land
Express it, receive it, accept it too
Responding to another is what to do
For they see a something inside of you
Similarities connect a couple of two
Intimacy is the level of love
You share with each other creating two dove
A two-way street where respect is earned
But when it is lost the dove is burned
An apology is needed and the love is returned
The dove are in love and the desire is yearned
Oh, by the way .. Brokenhead morphed into CousinBasil. As if you didn't know ;-)
You're intuition is mahhvelous .. simply mahhhh.........
PS - Pull over here, we're stayin' the night.
She said, "Pull over here, we're stayin' the night."
It was a great day to be alive!
Pace yourself, David.David Quinn wrote:Careful, don't go out on a limb there, |read|
Hard to believe, but this thread is actually going downhill as it goes along.
I'm now fascinated to see where it will end.
-