Multiple orgasms, large testes and psychological correlation

[Jason]

Sexuality and sexual organs are still taboo and because of that some people may find parts of what I'm about to say funny and not take it seriously, but I'm being completely serious and this is just straightforward honest biology and anatomy folks so....

I'm curious to know if any of the other males here are multi-orgasmic. By that I mean that after orgasm and ejaculation your erection isn't lost(unless stimulation ceases) and many orgasms and ejaculations can be had on the same initial single erection(in very close succession if the stimulation is sufficient.)

I don't have a refractory period and this is supposedly rare in males. I've always been intrigued by it, but there doesn't appear to have been that much study into it, although some of the research* that I've found reports that unlike in the majority of males, prolactin doesn't shoot up after orgasm in those lacking a refractory period. Prolactin lowers both testosterone and dopamine amongst other things. Oxytocin has also been theorized to have some involvement. In addition to this I apparently have unusually large testes, about double the average volume, which puts me beyond the normal range.

I personally have not made the connection between masculinity, men and proficiency with philosophy and rationality etc, as QSR and others say they have. I'm open to the possibility that the lack of connection on my part could be explained by my ignorance of the area, owing to my relative lack of experience with women. I do however think it obvious that biology affects behaviour though. These are two reasons why I'm exploring these issues - maybe a lot of the other posters here are also big-balled multi-orgasmic males ;). I also wonder if these unusual biological characteristics may be somewhat responsible for, and help to explain, some of my psychological and idealogical views on sex.

*Absence of orgasm-induced prolactin secretion in a healthy multi-orgasmic male subject(pdf)

[1otherS]

There are Taoist 'pleasure'-techniques downloadable on Limewire. They enable you to have multiple head-orgasms without ejaculating...All this is done through simple breathing-exercises and working out. I hope the QRS-followers investigate this, as it would greatly improve their lives.

[mystex]

I plan to not jerk-off in 2009. I wonder if that's healthy...

[Jason]

There are Taoist 'pleasure'-techniques downloadable on Limewire. They enable you to have multiple head-orgasms without ejaculating...All this is done through simple breathing-exercises and working out. I hope the QRS-followers investigate this, as it would greatly improve their lives.

I've read quite a bit about these techniques but they are an entirely different thing to what I'm talking about. What I'm referring to are natural fully ejaculatory orgasms every time, there are no special techniques involved, just continuation of conventional sexual stimulation after each orgasm. Ejaculation occurs every time(although after a while all available semen is depleted, then just the ejaculatory contractions are left), most males are just not physiologically capable of this type of multiple orgasm.

The Taoist approach tries to overcome this limitation by forced and unnatural methods that prevent ejaculation at orgasm. It's akin to eating a meal "multiple times" by putting the food into your mouth for a few seconds then spitting it out and then repeating this over and over without actually ever chewing or swallowing the food. Very lame. I've unintentionally had this so-called type of "orgasm" where there is no simultaneous ejaculation and it's an extremely poor substitute for the real thing, pleasure is majorly decreased, I'd easily prefer a single real ejaculatory orgasm.

[Cognition]

I plan to not jerk-off in 2009. I wonder if that's healthy...

I'm pretty sure it's healthier to just jack off and get it out of your system!

[1otherS]

I disagree with Jason: you prevent "coming close to no-return" with these methods WITHOUT any mindgames and trigger more than head or groin-orgasms...you basically experience natural highs over your entire body.

[Ryan Rudolph]

Just to expand...

Orgasms are almost entirely cognitively triggered, as opposed to sensory triggered. Years ago, when I was more sexually active, I learned this, as I have a refractory period strong enough to put me out of commission for half a day afterwards, so I learned how to control the ejaculation to last a long time by controlling the sexual cognition during the act.

Basically, a man not only needs visual stimulus and sensory stimulus, but he needs to think about what he’s experiencing in a certain way before he ejaculates, and if he refuses to think “that” way, then he doesn’t ejaculate…

In actuality, a man isn’t controlled by his dick, as women like to accuse him of, he is controlled by a system of sexual thought (neurotically woven into his mind), which drives his ejaculations.

The system of thought is what causes an erection, and eventually brings him to climax. However, at the molecular level, the system of thought itself is probably driven by certain hormonal and biochemical processes that are demanding a reaction.

[imd12c4funn]

Hey Jason,
Where did your data come from? Reference(s) please.

I have 11 orgasms to my credit in one session. It took ten hours with two hot women, and honestly, I would have added to that tally had they both not begged me to stop.

It may have been stubborness on my part not to allow them to wear me out. Yet, by them begging for relief, worn raw and exhausted, was as pleasurable for me awarded bragging rights as the intimacy and desire was to my penis-ego.

I would not suggest this be attempted without training, (my girl at the time was totally bi and brought home women from her health club twice a week on average).

With these experiences, the most valuable lesson learned was to read others as to how this type of stereotypical fantasy would effect them post-. I became expert at this ability and from this insight, did turn down many of these fests so as not to cause psychological future problems for them.

Since this personal record, I have not been able to exceed the triumph due to most women having even less stamina.

As for the statement about Most Men, I must object.
Unless you have some demographic data, and even if so, I must conclude this is just speculation and opinion.
P.S., no viagra or similar. I used to joke that I needed anti-viagra.

Also, my sack and package is above average, but not a feak of nature.

[Carl G]

The Taoist approach tries to overcome this limitation by forced and unnatural methods that prevent ejaculation at orgasm. It's akin to eating a meal "multiple times" by putting the food into your mouth for a few seconds then spitting it out and then repeating this over and over without actually ever chewing or swallowing the food. Very lame. I've unintentionally had this so-called type of "orgasm" where there is no simultaneous ejaculation and it's an extremely poor substitute for the real thing, pleasure is majorly decreased, I'd easily prefer a single real ejaculatory orgasm.

It is not "very lame" if one does it correctly. Orgasms can be triggered which are whole body and last for hours. Why would you prefer an 8 second ejaculation to this?

[Jason]

Hey Jason,
Where did your data come from? Reference(s) please.

Click on the (usually)blue-highlighted words in my posts to this thread, they link to some references and studies.

I have 11 orgasms to my credit in one session. It took ten hours with two hot women, and honestly, I would have added to that tally had they both not begged me to stop.

Did you have a single erection for the entire session? If you read my initial post you'll see that I'm discussing men who are capable of having many ejaculatory orgasms with a single erection - they do not have what is known as a refractory period(downtime needed between successive erections and ejaculatory orgasms). For example, I'm capable of having ten orgasms in twenty minutes with one erection, and I've seen similar numbers from one of the few medical studies into this. From what I've read the average man has a refractory period of around thirty minutes, and you averaged just under one orgasm per hour which is actually considerably worse than average.

With these experiences, the most valuable lesson learned was to read others as to how this type of stereotypical fantasy would effect them post-. I became expert at this ability and from this insight, did turn down many of these fests so as not to cause psychological future problems for them.

What type of psychological problems do you imagine this might cause?

[mansman]

Sexuality and sexual organs are still taboo and because of that some people may find parts of what I'm about to say funny and not take it seriously, but I'm being completely serious and this is just straightforward honest biology and anatomy folks so....

I'm curious to know if any of the other males here are multi-orgasmic. By that I mean that after orgasm and ejaculation your erection isn't lost(unless stimulation ceases) and many orgasms and ejaculations can be had on the same initial single erection(in very close succession if the stimulation is sufficient.)

I don't have a refractory period and this is supposedly rare in males. I've always been intrigued by it, but there doesn't appear to have been that much study into it, although some of the research* that I've found reports that unlike in the majority of males, prolactin doesn't shoot up after orgasm in those lacking a refractory period. Prolactin lowers both testosterone and dopamine amongst other things. Oxytocin has also been theorized to have some involvement. In addition to this I apparently have unusually large testes, about double the average volume, which puts me beyond the normal range.

I personally have not made the connection between masculinity, men and proficiency with philosophy and rationality etc, as QSR and others say they have. I'm open to the possibility that the lack of connection on my part could be explained by my ignorance of the area, owing to my relative lack of experience with women.

I then help you make connections, ok?
What do you see now, just right now this moment(s) what do you look at? Is your hot babes? Is your big balls? Or is my words, which you see now?
Correct! my words, they are burning in your brain with no room for anything else, eh.
But only short time, i understand. After quick reply you maybe back to the sex, the girls so hot burned powerfully in your mind. I know for sure if competition my words they loose, no dout'about. The feminine in your life and mind is...how you say? prominent, shes been like branded deeper and deeper with every stroke, suck and squirt, thousands of them. We all been there probably, most anyway. So you fertile ground for all things feminine, all that is including thoughts, you can say the feminine mindset, which im sure you capishe is flip side of coin from the masculine consciousness, thisa only defenition, ok then? you catching on my friend?
Need I say more? Lets say you meat and patatoes man, then the veggies they suck. Not true? Yes is the true. Green beans and the brocolli they not so good, you have a taste for flesh.
Spinach they confuse your mouth and mind, but the good news is some can learn to appreciate the veggies, but only after stay away the meat, not easy but completely doable, then after many weeks months if you see some flesh not like before, taste no more good.
Capishe?
Ok then, you have one life to live, only one, eat wisely.
M

I do however think it obvious that biology affects behaviour though. These are two reasons why I'm exploring these issues - maybe a lot of the other posters here are also big-balled multi-orgasmic males ;). I also wonder if these unusual biological characteristics may be somewhat responsible for, and help to explain, some of my psychological and idealogical views on sex.

*Absence of orgasm-induced prolactin secretion in a healthy multi-orgasmic male subject(pdf)

[David Quinn]

I don't see the philosophical purpose of this thread. Perhaps Jason can explain why he thinks this has some sort of connection to the advancement of wisdom.

-

[Ryan Rudolph]

I thought it might lead somewhere interesting, but it doesn't seem so... However, there is probably a relationship between testes size and the amount of sex hormone produced, which in return could affect how often one thinks about sex, and how often one thinks about chasing women in general. Perhaps men with big balls are doomed to higher numbers of sexual attachments in their lifetime...

[1otherS]

Men with big balls are also destined for greater creativity and productivity. This has been documented.

[Carl G]

Good to know! Thanks, I'll definitely keep that in mind when I'm hiring for my new landscaping business.

[Shahrazad]

You will inspect men's balls while you interview them? They will think you want them for sexual tasks.

Hint: black males tend to be well endowed. Jews seem to come in second, while Chinese come in last.

[1otherS]

Good to know! Thanks, I'll definitely keep that in mind when I'm hiring for my new landscaping business.

Haha, you made a funny- this is making progress and all that.

1.Big balls= higher chance of stimulated drive.

2.Stimulated drive= more motivation to work out, educate oneself, find attractive people to gather with.

3.This motivation leads to social proof and poise.

4.More social proof and poise are great to have in an employee.