Skepticism
- Matt Gregory
- Posts: 1537
- Joined: Tue Jun 07, 2005 11:40 am
- Location: United States
Skepticism
This point may seem strange, but I think it is useless to absolutely doubt the existence of something, even things like a powerful god or unicorns.
Why? Because the nonexistence of a thing cannot be proven, the possibility of encountering an allegedly nonexistent thing cannot be discounted, so the absolute doubt of the existence of a thing is an attitude that creates a mental block in the form of defense of this error.
If you want to doubt something, the proper way to do it is to doubt the correctness of the means of getting to it. There's always the possibility that a thing exists but isn't being approached in the right way.
That is skepticism; absolute doubt is not. Absolute doubt is simple denial, a belief in a negative, no different from positively believing in something without proof. The same logical error is being committed in both cases.
Of course, there's nothing wrong with disbelieving in things whose existence is logically impossible, like a square circle or something. It would be insane to entertain the possibility of impossible things.
And then there's the issue of not wanting to pursue something and no one can be faulted for that. But there is a lot more integrity in thinking you won't pursue something because you don't want to rather than because it supposedly doesn't exist, as one truth is complete but one error leads to a thousand.
Skepticism isn't belief nor disbelief, it's an unknowing.
Why? Because the nonexistence of a thing cannot be proven, the possibility of encountering an allegedly nonexistent thing cannot be discounted, so the absolute doubt of the existence of a thing is an attitude that creates a mental block in the form of defense of this error.
If you want to doubt something, the proper way to do it is to doubt the correctness of the means of getting to it. There's always the possibility that a thing exists but isn't being approached in the right way.
That is skepticism; absolute doubt is not. Absolute doubt is simple denial, a belief in a negative, no different from positively believing in something without proof. The same logical error is being committed in both cases.
Of course, there's nothing wrong with disbelieving in things whose existence is logically impossible, like a square circle or something. It would be insane to entertain the possibility of impossible things.
And then there's the issue of not wanting to pursue something and no one can be faulted for that. But there is a lot more integrity in thinking you won't pursue something because you don't want to rather than because it supposedly doesn't exist, as one truth is complete but one error leads to a thousand.
Skepticism isn't belief nor disbelief, it's an unknowing.
Last edited by Matt Gregory on Sun Mar 04, 2007 5:28 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 3771
- Joined: Tue Sep 05, 2006 11:35 am
Re: Skepticism
This does not logically follow, and I think the problem is in your definition of doubt. Saying "I can not prove that unicorns do not exist, therefore I do not doubt that unicorns do exist" is obviously foolish. It is also quite different from "I can not prove that unicorns do not exist, so I acknowledge the possibility that they do exist."Matt Gregory wrote:Because the nonexistence of a thing cannot be proven, the possibility of encountering an allegedly nonexistent thing cannot be discounted, so doubting the existence of a thing is an attitude that creates a mental block in the form of defense of this error.
"Doubt" means believing that it probably is not true, as opposed to believing that it is impossible.
.
- Matt Gregory
- Posts: 1537
- Joined: Tue Jun 07, 2005 11:40 am
- Location: United States
Re: Skepticism
Reminds me of a current thread over at Common Ascent where THE OFFICIAL GOD FAQ was posted for comment. At the actual site, the entire FAQ consists of:Matt Gregory wrote: Skepticism isn't belief nor disbelief, it's an unknowing.
Under that, in fine print is:THE OFFICIAL GOD FAQ
Question: “Is there a God?â€
Answer: “No.â€
To which I emailed them:In the quite unlikely event that you were to discover any omissions or inaccuracies on this page, they may be reported to the international headquarters of The Official God FAQ, at aod@400monkeys.com, where they will be thoroughly investigated, submitted to rigorous scientific testing and, if substantiated, included in a subsequent update. Thank you.
The correct answer is "Unknown."
Good Citizen Carl
- Matt Gregory
- Posts: 1537
- Joined: Tue Jun 07, 2005 11:40 am
- Location: United States
- Dan Rowden
- Posts: 5739
- Joined: Sun Sep 09, 2001 8:03 pm
- Contact:
Re: Skepticism
This is only true wherein the concepts contain no actual logical contradiction. If they do, their non-existence can be demonstrated.Matt Gregory wrote:This point may seem strange, but I think it is useless to absolutely doubt the existence of something, even things like a powerful god or unicorns.
- Matt Gregory
- Posts: 1537
- Joined: Tue Jun 07, 2005 11:40 am
- Location: United States
- Dan Rowden
- Posts: 5739
- Joined: Sun Sep 09, 2001 8:03 pm
- Contact:
Re: Skepticism
Good point, I agree.Matt Gregory wrote:
Why? Because the nonexistence of a thing cannot be proven, the possibility of encountering an allegedly nonexistent thing cannot be discounted, so the absolute doubt of the existence of a thing is an attitude that creates a mental block in the form of defense of this error.
-
- Posts: 134
- Joined: Sat Mar 31, 2007 8:46 am
I need an editor...
All truth has connections, just like errors...So, if something is true everything connected that produces that truth, obviously has to be right also...same thing with an error~ which I view it as a domino effect (negative)...denying is like shuting a door..hmmm
-
- Posts: 134
- Joined: Sat Mar 31, 2007 8:46 am
- Philosophaster
- Posts: 563
- Joined: Sat Aug 20, 2005 10:19 am
Re: Skepticism
True, although I think that a person may doubt his own ability to determine correctly what things are logically impossible. Complete skepticism includes doubt about whether your methods of assessing ideas are reliable methods.Matt Gregory wrote:Of course, there's nothing wrong with disbelieving in things whose existence is logically impossible, like a square circle or something.
- Matt Gregory
- Posts: 1537
- Joined: Tue Jun 07, 2005 11:40 am
- Location: United States
Re: Skepticism
Which is fine until the doubt becomes a certainty and the belief that no one at all can determine anything correctly. That's a contradictory position and probably the most detrimental belief a person can hold to.Philosophaster wrote:True, although I think that a person may doubt his own ability to determine correctly what things are logically impossible. Complete skepticism includes doubt about whether your methods of assessing ideas are reliable methods.Matt Gregory wrote:Of course, there's nothing wrong with disbelieving in things whose existence is logically impossible, like a square circle or something.
We can determine things correctly if we keep things simple. It's not hard to see that a shape can't be a square and a circle at the same time. There's no room for error in such a simple problem.
-
- Posts: 411
- Joined: Wed Nov 29, 2006 7:11 pm
-
- Posts: 134
- Joined: Sat Mar 31, 2007 8:46 am
-
- Posts: 134
- Joined: Sat Mar 31, 2007 8:46 am