The theorem does not fall upon existence, that is witticism which cannot come before either, or, unless the either, or is definitive as to why either, or can find life to exist. No one has given logic, either, or, as to why. This does indeed mean logic cannot go further than the theorem it's based on, but to find the base of logic, there must be an object. The object is therefore existence. As logic must have a base, existence also must have a base. That base is cause. Cause for existence has been totally ignored because to find cause is to give logic for existence. This means logic cannot become a subjective object of discussion until the cause has been defined.The axiom is existence: that something exists and not not-exists. It comes before the "why".
As logic cannot go further than the axioms it's based on, the question "why" cannot address existence. This does not annihilate logic, it only shows how logic is the ultimate consequence of having existence of anything at all.
Existence (and there is nothing but) has no ultimate consequence. Which is why, first of all, I described the logic for the universe as more.
To say the above quote is to say that existence exist because. What is missing is because of what?
Moreover, to describe logic for the universe as more, does not tell us the more of what?
The lack of understanding here is the application of logic to what is illogical. The gist of this theme is not concerning the existence of the universe, but existence. What is it that cause existence to produce consequence of effect? To make it simple, what is the cause of existence to exist in existence?
Supposed logic has been give for the existence of the universe, now will someone apply logic as to why existence exist, and why existence exist in existence. Someone please give us the cause for the logic of existence - pretty please. A little jufa humor I hope is accepted in good taste.
Never give power to anything a person believes is their source of strength - jufa
