I understand why one would want to break down the barriers that people have erected against becoming logical, that one would want to become the guardian spirit of logic, but can you also understand why one would want to break down the barriers that people have erected against other forms of conscious thinking, to become their guardian spirit? It's not the becoming logical that I question, becoming logical is absolutely necessary for ego survival in its playground of time and space, it is the equating of becoming logical with becoming the Infinite that I question.David Quinn:To break down the many barriers that people have erected against it.movinalways: Then why sing the singular song of logic?
The path to enlightenment is: the full and free use of logic + intuition + courage + the whole-hearted desire to truly understand. Nothing can be accomplished if any of these components is absent.
A spiritual man in relation to my definition of Nature [see below] is a man who is wise to the principles and patterns of Nature [time and space], but being aware that Nature is but one realm of infinite realms, of which none is he separate, keeps his awareness open to be moved 'out' of Nature and into 'one' of these 'alternate' realms.David Quinn:Is there a difference?movingalways wrote:
The question I have for you is: Are you a natural man or a spiritual man?
"Nature" is a label you give to the totality of reality, but not one that I give to the totality of reality. My definition of Nature is the ego-universe-time-space realm [of the (infinite realms) of the Totality/Infinite].David Quinn:
"Nature" is just a label given to the totality of reality. Other labels could be "God", or "Tao", or "The Infinite". Again, these are just labels and nothing more. Let's call it "Fwull", if you want.
Since you equate Nature with The Infinite, and you said logic is but one thing the Infinite creates, is it not logical then that there are worlds or realms of the Infinite yet to be discovered that are not logical realms?