Re: Practial steps to enlightment
Posted: Mon Apr 07, 2008 10:50 am
Those too!
-
-
Discussion of the nature of Ultimate Reality and the path to Enlightenment
http://theabsolute.net/phpBB/
You are the most submissive female I have seen in my life.Sue Hindmarsh wrote:David wrote:
it helps to burn your brides
And your bridges too!! ; )
I know you mean feminine=unconscious and masculine=conscious. Then call them as such, and avoid the time and energy wasted in futile arguments. Most argumentation here would cease with this simple remapping.Sue Hindmarsh wrote: If you believe the "psychological aspect of enlightenment" is "the main aspect", how could you consider the discussion of the "femininity vs masculinity" invalid; for it’s the very basis of psychology (unconsciousness vs consciousness)? Remaining ignorant of the consequences of the feminine blocks you from getting anywhere near enlightenment. You shall remain in 'Hell' until you take steps to awaken from her grasp.
Hey I do not think it is very wise to put everything on enlightenment, it is not going to make you a superman and solve all the practical problems of living. And anyways according to me it is not practiced through exclusion of other activities but the practice is a part of the other activities.David Quinn wrote:it helps to burn your bridges and cut off all other avenues of sustenance, such that it becomes a matter of life and death for you. A matter of enlightenment or bust.
That would only serve to paper over the important distinction between unconsciousness occurring within the masculine mind (caused by fear and mental blocks) and unconsciousness occurring within the feminine mind (caused by an inherent incapacity to think consistently and make deeper connections).maestro wrote:I know you mean feminine=unconscious and masculine=conscious. Then call them as such, and avoid the time and energy wasted in futile arguments. Most argumentation here would cease with this simple remapping.Sue Hindmarsh wrote: If you believe the "psychological aspect of enlightenment" is "the main aspect", how could you consider the discussion of the "femininity vs masculinity" invalid; for it’s the very basis of psychology (unconsciousness vs consciousness)? Remaining ignorant of the consequences of the feminine blocks you from getting anywhere near enlightenment. You shall remain in 'Hell' until you take steps to awaken from her grasp.
Your outburst is bizarre. What were you thinking?You are the most submissive female I have seen in my life.David: it helps to burn your brides
Sue: And your bridges too!! ; )
Why? What does anyone else matter?
Just a brief afterthought here...Sue Hindmarsh wrote:David wrote:
it helps to burn your brides
And your bridges too!! ; )
It sounds like you are on the right track, but what the fuck do I know. Just keep your wits about you and have no fear.relo wrote:For me, my path for what I see as has started when I was around 13, age 15 was when I realized what was happening and I created a sort of "sitting on others shoes" type logic, and right now at 18 it seems im pertaining myself to knowledge on how others have walked a similar path towards mine, atleast that's what I intend / expect for now.
It was orders of magnitude funnier than that. But typos, no matter how delicious and so much more seemingly Freudian slipesque than you realise, don't constitute Freudian slips.Just a brief afterthought here...
This really tickled me. An excellent example of a Freudian slip, considering DQ's deep seated chauvinism against women.
mikiel
I dedicate this one especially for you, Mikiel:mikiel wrote:Just a brief afterthought here...Sue Hindmarsh wrote:David wrote:
it helps to burn your brides
And your bridges too!! ; )
This really tickled me. An excellent example of a Freudian slip, considering DQ's deep seated chauvinism against women.
True, I don't know you guys all that well, but you do come accross to me as "male chauvinist pigs."Dan Rowden wrote:Hahaha, I think you're a tad too full of New Age moral righteousness to recognize a satirical joke when it's presented to you.
Yeah, that and he takes his worldly education too seriously.... = ego.Dan Rowden wrote:Hahaha, I think you're a tad too full of New Age moral righteousness to recognize a satirical joke when it's presented to you.
mikiel wrote:...Anyone who proposes that their journey to awakening is a good prescripton for everyone is undoubtably still just dreaming of Awakening and the riches that will come from the fame of having found the Holy Grail. Don't buy it. ..And don't buy The Ascetic Path Is The Only Way either. It works well in the East, (and and makes starving to death easier and more noble), but it is still just a cultural/religious belief system.)
m
First there was a slice of bread, then there was no slice of bread because it was peanut butter and jelly filling, and then there was a slice of bread again.Carl G wrote:truth_justice,
Please stop quizzing people as though the subject is "how to make a peanut butter and jelly sandwich."
PJ818 wrote: The truth about life they don't teach in schools just boggles the mind, eh? <bg> However, I'm not saying there isn't basis for some of the conclusions. Just doesn't go far enough and I'd like to run the framework I've been shown by ya'll.
David Quinn wrote:Welcome, PJ:
PJ818 wrote: The truth about life they don't teach in schools just boggles the mind, eh? <bg> However, I'm not saying there isn't basis for some of the conclusions. Just doesn't go far enough and I'd like to run the framework I've been shown by ya'll.
What areas do you think it is lacking?
-