Well gee Scott, if that's all you want, just go get the inflatable kind.sschaula wrote:Like what? That's pretty much what it boils down to.This is not a very well thought out statement. You haven't even described wha kind of interest you are talking about. If you mean any kind of interest then you are completely off point. There are reasons aside from fucking to want to discuss women.
You are doing a pretty terrible job of it by make statements like this:sschaula wrote:Wow....isn't that what I've been doing in this topic?
What if? If discussing self improvement in this manner doesn't help someone, it's not because of the method that their progress is being hindered, it's because they don't have the ability to do so in the first place.sschaula wrote:Let me ask a question - what if discussing our own self improvement in terms of woman/man is hindering our progress?
Every time someone utters those words, I think of Ben Harper. I don’t believe I’ve ever heard such a concise and passionate lament as his.…the woman in you
Much better than "should we eat women, or send them to Venus" etc. Real sages don't participate in wank fests, nor do they attend TSFMWDPET meetings.You are doing a pretty terrible job of it by make statements like this:
Scott - "If a guy isn't interested in women, he won't display interest."
I like how blindly you've taken to the spoonfeeding...not even asking mommy what's in it. That's a good little boy. Goo goo gah gah.This statement says nothing. Nevermind the fact that there is too many philosophical reasons that a man should be interested in Woman.
Talking about how women should be dealt with...eaten, sent to venus, used as baby machines, etc...helps some people improve? Haha.What if? If discussing self improvement in this manner doesn't help someone, it's not because of the method that their progress is being hindered, it's because they don't have the ability to do so in the first place.
There is not much point in taking David's words seriously. Think for yourself.There is not much point in taking Scott's words seriously.
Are you not? You and every other man here seems pretty obsessed with the eternal "her". I am sick of trying to shove down my natural feelings in an attempt to be more wise. I think it's unwise to do that.He is looking for Miss Right.
That's impossible. It will always remain with me, until I die.When he finds her, he will not give philosophy another thought again.
So dramatic. I think there was a smooth enough transition when I just left the forum. I didn't look back until the other day when I decided I'd check this place out again.All this "there is no enlightenment/everyone is a fool/everything is equal" spiel is simply his way of ensuring a smooth transition. He is laying the groundwork for leaving philosophy behind.
Actually it's not.sschaula wrote:Much better than "should we eat women, or send them to Venus" etc. Real sages don't participate in wank fests, nor do they attend TSFMWDPET meetings.
I love how people who knock the "woman thing" on this forum always end up revealing that they only wish to keep women their personal toy or servant.sschaula wrote:I like how blindly you've taken to the spoonfeeding...not even asking mommy what's in it. That's a good little boy. Goo goo gah gah.
There are no philosophical reasons why man should be interested in woman. Being interested in my car, or in vaseline, or in the latest movie, is just as philosophical...and that's not very philosophical!
So you discuss and regard all things as equally significant in relation to yourself? Well, good luck with that!sschaula wrote:If things have no inherent existence, which is the fundamental absolute truth, then why is one thing greater than another to you? It shows a lack of philosophy, and also a lack of getting any, that you philosophers have been discussing things like this.
You are a fine example of this.sschaula wrote:You could get by without getting any if you added a bit more philosophy to the mix. And you would do very well if you took the stupidity out of the mix. Philosophy and stupidity are like ketchup and peanut butter...they don't really go so well together.
What can I say except that you're hopeless.sschaula wrote:Talking about how women should be dealt with...eaten, sent to venus, used as baby machines, etc...helps some people improve? Haha.
Actually it is.Actually it's not.
I'm not going to deny that I wish that. Man, by nature, is this way. Anyone who denies it is a liar...and never anything more than a liar.I love how people who knock the "woman thing" on this forum always end up revealing that they only wish to keep women their personal toy or servant.
Yep, it's quite hard from a human viewpoint. In fact, it's impossible...which is why I don't claim to be wise, and why I say this is a waste of time. Because when the philosophical journey ends, you find yourself back where you started.So you discuss and regard all things as equally significant in relation to yourself? Well, good luck with that!
As are you.You are a fine example of this.
What can I say except that there's hope for you, if only you'd pull your head out of your ass?What can I say except that you're hopeless.
Man by nature is many ways, it just depends on which of his ways you value most.sschaula wrote:I'm not going to deny that I wish that. Man, by nature, is this way. Anyone who denies it is a liar...and never anything more than a liar.
I think it says a lot about how you truly view women. You're stand-offish attitude towards the way women are discussed on this forum is reflective of your attachment to her, and unwillingness to bother with overcoming it.sschaula wrote:Me being this way says nothing about how I truly view women. It just says something about my sexual/emotional urges. It says that I have a penis, and it works. Says that the "primitive" parts of my brain and nervous system still function.
Like I said before, it's about values.sschaula wrote:No man on this forum doesn't want to keep women as their own. Every man here wants to be able to have her. I'm not going to take myself out of that barrel of monkeys, I too want that. So what? Does that make me unwise? Does it make those who lie to themselves more intelligent than I?
Actually I believe you, in another thread you said "wisdom sucks and ignorance sucks". When everything sucks I guess you can honestly say nothing is more significant than the other. Maybe you really are a nihilist and you just haven't come to terms with it yet.sschaula wrote:Yep, it's quite hard from a human viewpoint. In fact, it's impossible...which is why I don't claim to be wise, and why I say this is a waste of time. Because when the philosophical journey ends, you find yourself back where you started.
Man doesn't erradicate his attraction to woman from his biology by any means.Man by nature is many ways, it just depends on which of his ways you value most.
You thought wrong. I used to be one of the people talking about women in this way. I just took my head out of my ass. I already "overcame her" in the way every other person has here...little good that did, seeing as how it doesn't go away. It's only corrupted my view of who women are. It especially does so from a distance.I think it says a lot about how you truly view women. You're stand-offish attitude towards the way women are discussed on this forum is reflective of your attachment to her, and unwillingness to bother with overcoming it.
Bullshit.Like I said before, it's about values.
The only problem is that I never said everything sucks.Actually I believe you, in another thread you said "wisdom sucks and ignorance sucks". When everything sucks I guess you can honestly say nothing is more significant than the other. Maybe you really are a nihilist and you just haven't come to terms with it yet.
He can erradicate it from is psychology. Besides I wasn't talking about eradication, just pointing out that you can choose to not let primitive impulses control your mind. Just because you can't do it doesn't mean others can't. You are kind of like a psychological socialist, or dare I say communist.sschaula wrote:Man doesn't erradicate his attraction to woman from his biology by any means.
You haven't overcome anything, you failed and you know it. I even recall you saying before you left the forum a while back that you were planning on dating a few women. So what are you here for?sschaula wrote:I already "overcame her" in the way every other person has here...little good that did, seeing as how it doesn't go away. It's only corrupted my view of who women are. It especially does so from a distance.
All actions are either based in ignorance or wisdom, when you said you think that both "suck" you're inferring that everything we do is for "a sucky reason". This wreaks of nihilism.sschaula wrote:The only problem is that I never said everything sucks.
What's the matter, getting tired of having to face your ignorance?sschaula wrote:Why do you bicker on an internet messageboard, like a bitch, Nick?
You're kind of like an annoying dick. But regarding what you said - you can choose not to let primitive impulses control your mind but that doesn't get rid of them. So if I admit to wanting to conquer women sexually, or whatever it was I admitted to, then it says nothing about me in the sense that you're talking about. In the sense of what I do with my primitive impulses in regards to my actions.He can erradicate it from is psychology. Besides I wasn't talking about eradication, just pointing out that you can choose to not let primitive impulses control your mind. Just because you can't do it doesn't mean others can't. You are kind of like a psychological socialist, or dare I say communist.
Yes I have "overcome woman". You don't know how my personal life has been. For the past year and a half I've avoided the opposite sex and looked from a distance, seeing what they were like.You haven't overcome anything, you failed and you know it. I even recall you saying before you left the forum a while back that you were planning on dating a few women. So what are you here for?
Uhhh...that's kind of sucky reasoning that you've got there.All actions are either based in ignorance or wisdom, when you said you think that both "suck" you're inferring that everything we do is for "a sucky reason". This wreaks of nihilism.
I'm used to it. What else could there be? I certainly don't have the stupid idea that I could one day stop facing it.What's the matter, getting tired of having to face your ignorance?
