deceit wrote:Pincho Paxton wrote:I find an odd paradox on this site, that enlightenment is about being free of delusion, yet the members seem to come across as delusional. Some talk about life as a dream state, and others feel that they can know all things by ignoring science, and living in an inner eye.
Pincho Paxton wrote: You just have to accept that nothing doesn't come from anywhere. Two particles create nothing, they don't need to come from anywhere....
As far as I know Science does not have an answer nor even a theoretical accurate proposition as to what create This Universe. How are you not sure that this Universe isn't cyclic and has already died a great many a deaths an rebirthed What happens if this Universe is just inside of other Transient Universes's inside the womb of our Mother inside a field mulitple Universes.
You must remember that This Universe is 13 Billion years old. You 20-100 years old. In Your life time you wouldn't even be able to count to 13 billion let alone comprehend all the events in the Cosmos at every point in time at every stage of the great and never ending Miracle that is Energy.
Remember as we apes talk, we must remember that Physics/Maths only Measures our environment that we perceive with our limited 5 senses. We try and Understand it using these concepts. Some of these concepts we appear to have Understood and are using it to our advantage. Yay for the iPod. But dont be mistaken that Science as a collective school rejects theories that may obliterate everything we've come to know as "Fact" which you base your theories on. The Universe is not human although we are definitely apart of it which means our grasp on it is as good as our Sanity.
How long is a piece of string one might say?
Hmm, what is the string were too long for us too see too measure? Unless you have access to the Universal Mind which through your astonishing observations seems evident you aren't even at scope with how much we dont Know.
My personal belief is unless you open your options to the endlessness of possibility you will never come close to the Truer answers you claim to know via some "delusional process".
Pincho Paxton wrote:Enlightenment is really about physics.
Can you understand the physics without understanding some science? If you don't understand the physics then you will make the mistake that you live in a dream world. Then you are delusional, and not enlightened.
Pincho Paxton wrote:You cannot be enlightened without understanding physics.
You cannot understand physics without behind Enlightened.
What are you on about, this is the dream world. We've dreamt for centuries. It's part of our Nature to Dream. To process information Dreaming in both sleeping and waking states. How do you think you came to dream up these hypotheses?
Meh I'm bored :)
Science doesn't have an answer because scientists follow trends. Newton started a trend, and science has stuck with it. I rejected all knowledge, and started everything from scratch. I ignored science, I ignored the dictionary, I ignored my senses, and I ignored my language, and I ignored my eyes, and I ignored my touch. I trusted my logic to solve how nothing can become something.
There is only one way to move a stationary object from nothing, that creates everything. And it is because there is only one way to do it, that makes my theory the correct answer to everything.
The only way to move a stationary object is to realise that science has forgot about scale. The universe cannot make any decisions, so atoms should not be all the same size. Scale is a decision, and to repeat the scale over, and over again means that something is happening to atoms to force them to be a single scale. Sand is also a closely matched scale, and we know that there are physics forcing that scale to happen, but those physics are also related to atoms again. So to move a stationary object from a standing start you need to inflate the particles around that object. Like balloons, you can inflate a bunch of balloons, and they will push against each other, and move each other from a standing start. So energy is inflation, and inflation is scale. If you keep inflating the balloons the pressure gets greater, and greater, and the balloons get crushed against each other. The loss of freedom that gradually happens means that atoms are now all going to end up the same size. The atoms have no freedom to scale anymore.
The inflation from a standing start creates movement, and limits scale eventually, so you get atoms all the same size.
It is the only way to move things from a standing start. It is the only way to create energy from nothing. So science doesn't need to argue my answer. It need to tell me that there is another way to move something from a standing start. Some idea that I haven't thought of.
Now you need to be intelligent to come up with an alternative form of movement. If you are stupid, you will say that particles could have a tiny engine inside them to move them along. OK, that is stupid because of the fact that the Universe cannot make decisions, and that an engine is made from so many parts that the repeating structure in all atoms would be impossible.
Most answers will be stupid. Inflation is scale, and the physics are very tiny steps. The size of an object is there to be seen. An apple has scale, an orange has scale, and an egg has scale, and we have scale. Nothing can make decisions in the Universe, so eggs are not a size based on a decision. It all comes down to atoms, and no decision can be made for the size of atoms. Scale is a major clue, but search for scale in science, and it is being ignored.
My theory is ignored because it is based on a new form of logic. Not maths, but the science of a none determined universe that has Cause, and effect from all none determined states. All none determined states based on scale, and based on a standing Universe of nothing. The origin of movement being the only way to move something from a standing start means that the first domino is fixed. The cause has only one domino. The effect has to be the next domino that inflation pushed the first object into movement. The second domino has no alternative either.
Soon you realise that all of the dominos have only one option. My theory is the only way to build the universe. There is no-one who is alive, or who has ever lived that is intelligent enough to even give me a response to my theory. All replies to my idea are pointless, and will seem to be stupid to me.