GENIUS FORUMS

Sectors that do not have a profit motive, i.e, funded by government or other sources. In other words, the public sector. In short, government-maintained police for example; which, in contrast with private police, is less efficient... Sectors that do not have a profit motive are less productive than...

Emboldened part - So we agree that men and women are represented differently in different sectors. So, we would also agree that men dominate the profit-based sectors, and women the fund-based ones(as is clearly exhibited by the links.) WTF do you mean by 'fund-based sectors'? is English your second...

Women and men do NOT vote largely alike, because they are NOT largely alike. A recent poll found that 62% of moderates were women, and this is in the context of 57% overall calling themselves liberal. So if your problem is with liberals and moderates (i.e. with anyone not aligned with the right), w...

Firstly, the point of the article was not whether women have caused the crisis, but whether their removal from work would solve it. I gave enough evidence to support that point, and I won't be bothered to do it again. You haven't given one iota of evidence in suppport of this ludicrous claim. Quite...

Hm...seems I was wrong here. You weren't merely wrong. You made shit up on the spot and claimed it to be a fact . I should have just pointed out that even there, the male dominated sectors are more productive by far than the female dominated ones. You are yet to define what you mean by 'productive'...

The USSR stagnated after a point of time, before which it was stable and thriving. Haven't you fucking gotten it yet, moron? You can't bullshit me . USSR was never stable and thriving. Ever. not under Stalin, not under Chrushchev, not under Brezhnev, not under Andropov... Ever . Shall i tell you ab...

And besides, it's female employment being higher than the world average is immaterial. It has a lower female employment rate than the western countries. hahaha. I was waiting for this, you little brainless weasel! You are so easy to manipulate, as ignorant idiots are wont to be! Watch : " The ...

You are forgetting that the USSR lost 26 mil. people and much of its industry in WW2. it consciously threw people into the meatgrinder, while evacuating the industry eastward. You don't know anything about the WWII history either, fool. Stop lying. BTW, Germany was just as devastated as USSR, perha...

Um, what does this prove? Many countries have a female employment rate higher than the world average. it proves that you cannot attribute China's good standing in the crisis to its low female employment, cretin! And the point of the article was that this was not the case with much of female and som...

I don't know what this has anything to do with it being more stable and stronger, or you growing up in USSR. Cretin, USSR was less stable (which is why it fell apart), weaker (which is why it couldn't keep up with the west), and you are a clueless little liar. Stop making shit up, kid. Many former ...

Shahrazad wrote:Victor said to jupta,

Stop fucking lying, you little bitch.

I love it. The bully was having fun hitting kids, then along came a bully twice his size who has the strength to shred him to pieces.

i am not a bully. i am the Holy Paladin of the Order of Ekonomikos.

The only thing I can care to respond to is the one about China - more women have employment because it has the largest population. No, moron, China has higher female employment rate than is the world average. Economic reality? So if there is a demand for more jobs, for whatever reason, but there is...

History suggests that socialist economies are actually stronger, more stable and more equally distributed than capitalist ones. Moron, i grew up in USSR. i know what it was like. Soviet economy sucked ass . USSR never posted unusually high growth compared to the rest of Europe, even though it was s...

No it doesn't. The solidest economies today - Russia, Japan, China, India, Saudi etc., - are all male-dominated. You know, you really shouldn't lie so brazenly. Russia's economy is a total basket-case, and China has higher female employment than the world average. Stop fucking lying, you little bit...

What I object to is reckless growth - growth for its own sake. Economic growth should be prioritized below the general well-being of the people - which includes their environmental and social standards. Scandinavian welfare capitalism is a step in this direction. No, it's not. Scandinavian culture ...

You already know that I favor Scandinavian-style welfare capitalism. if both socialism and capitalism are wrong in being growth-driven, then how can their hybrid, such as scandinavian flexicurity model, be any better? i would love to hear your explanation of that, and the reconciliation thereof wit...

The figures were not meant to be accurate, but that is the overall picture. of your delusion, yes. Which does not disprove the point that many women working in useless jobs were a cause. it does disprove the claims that women's employment is the cause of the credit crunch, or the crisis in general....

Even so, are you arguing that US environmental degradation is acceptable? No, i am arguing that to pronounce an equal "pox on both their houses", capitalism and socailism, is idiocy. Fine, then it's "bad" vs "horrible." That's not exactly my idea of an ideal situation....

Fewer women working all along = fewer jobs. ....Your point? My point is that the female employment is therefore not related to the credit crunch, which is what your article is about. In fact the credit crunch is mostly caused not by women working or making purchasing decisions, but by bankers and m...

I'll be happy to learn economics from you. What amazes me though, is that one of you has yet to provide a single valid point against what I wrote. When faced with such mountainous pile of biullshit as you have produced, I don't even know where to start. How about this one, idiot: " A brilliant...

Whose version of socialism? Stalin's? Pretty much any that's been actually implemented. No, Sweden is not socialist, despite what conreps will tell you. Your assertion presumes a monolithic socialism, which is absolute nonsense. my assertion relies on socialism as it has existed in the real world ....

That strikes me as baseless BS. I could easily and I dare say more reasonably claim the opposite to be true. See, Dan, this is the funny thing. I actually grew up under socialism; I have first-hand knowledge of what I am speaking about. Oh, i might have ended up in a psych ward there -- for politic...

I don't think it is necessary to defend socialism or any other system in order to criticize the current form of capitalism. However, "it has a tendency to fuck everything up because of focus on growth" is not a criticism. It's a whine. There are real criticisms of capitalism to be made. T...

Economically undeniable! The more I read of the babble you write, the more I am amazed that such an utter intellectual void as you actually exists. Seriously, do you have any clue about how economics works, and how economic condition relates to employment? To say nothing of your misogyny, which i h...

Capitalism and socialism both share a basis in the idea that economic growth and production are inherently desirable. For that reason, both have a tendency to f-ck everything up. Fuck what up? Which system do you think produces enough growth to permit you your leisure? Your lifestyle is made possib...