anddejavu wrote:Did any of my Australian brothers and sisters.....
and yet:dejavu wrote:My fellow countrymen....
dejavu wrote:With any luck, Sue'll be along in her pick-up to dump her guts on Woman too!
anddejavu wrote:Did any of my Australian brothers and sisters.....
and yet:dejavu wrote:My fellow countrymen....
dejavu wrote:With any luck, Sue'll be along in her pick-up to dump her guts on Woman too!
Those were buttons!!!?????Beingof1 wrote:Are you still trying to push my buttons?
Ooooooh so pithy! You must be very proud!Beingof1 wrote:There is a vast difference between innocence and holiness.
Innocence has no choice.
Science is built on correlation implying causation.Animus wrote:This is very important IJC: Correlation does NOT imply causation.
Not if you're breathing the right gases(or possibly even some liquids.)prince wrote:Breathing is suicide
Alex T. Jacob wrote:I don't think I have anything more to contribute so will now retire back into the deep night of ignorance and there sleeeeeeeep.
It was fun and interesting.
So would it be correct to say then, that your reasoning is telling you that reasoning is the correct method to use?David Quinn wrote:Absolutely.Jason wrote:Is it reasoning that tells you this?David Quinn wrote:You should never accept something as being true based on your feelings. You need to have far higher standards than that.
-
Is it reasoning that tells you this?David Quinn wrote:You should never accept something as being true based on your feelings. You need to have far higher standards than that.
Why do you refuse to deal with possibility of the world being a dream/hallucination/illusion?Alex T. Jacob wrote:Wait, can't I become an atheist apparatchik if I want to? A servant of the Machine? "A brat in a vat" as Jason would have it? ;-)