GENIUS FORUMS

(I'll just go with my replies in bold in context below) First, why is it that the whole can not exist without "an observer" dividing it up into parts? I never meant to imply that "the whole" can not exist without an observer, because "the whole" obviously doesn't have b...

I too see cosmos as Consciousness-made-manifest. However I don't see how this diminishes its 'reality quotient' as the objective cosmos... as an actual, real creation, dependent only upon the Creator (Universal consciousness) for its perpetual existence/reality. I must infer, from your statement ab...

Nick: Nothing can exist without an observer dividing things up (i.e. casting boundaries on to reality) in a way that distinguishes one thing from another. I can't be any more clear on this point. First, why is it that the whole can not exist without "an observer" dividing it up into parts?...

Iolaus: Mikiel, If you followed this discussion much, you'd know the answer to your question! No, he does not think we great apes create and sustain the world. It's true that I only drop in occassionally. Last time I did, I found this quote, with my emphasis in bold: Just as the props in our dreams ...

. The Mystic Doctrines of Taoism, Hinduism, Buddhism, Judaism, Christianity, Islam and the Secrets of Enoch. http://reluctant-messenger.com/citsym/understanding-God.htm . From the intro paragraph of the link I shared above: Not only do they (the six major Traditions) have different rites, rituals, ...

Jehu: Just as the props in our dreams are ultimately nothing more that constructs of the mind, operating upon our own personal store of knowledge, so to is the objective world a mind construct, and nowhere in it is there to be found anything that is real; that is to say, which is not mind dependent....

Nick, I can't help but notice that your answers are identical in style and similar in content to your gurus', the founders of this forum, i.e., cryptic absurdities with no attemt to make sense, explain, or clarify. (I guess it's the established standard for "cool" here, and you are downrig...

If I were to leave this forum with one link to the ultimate wisdom of enlightenment, I would just bump the link last shared in my post above. (Oh... I'd include links to all of Franklin Merrell-Wolff's work too... some shared here recently. (Ask if interested.) Just to highlight it again (wisdom fro...

Nick: (composit of posts above) You don't see any importance in knowing that things lose all meaning, and ultimately their continued existence if there wasn't an observer there to support it?... ...and ultimately all things cease to exist without an observer there to support them.... ...Take away th...

Interesting topic. What if "the most basic foundation of reality itself" is intelligent consciousness manifesting as energy/plasma/matter? QM has astounded the scientific community with experiments confirming that "entangled particles" are intelligently connected (constantly in s...

This is for the general readership of the forum, as Kelly Jones and I have declared an end to our tediuus conversation. Regarding KJ's statements: So you do know that the law of identity is A=A? All it means is that a thing is what it is, and not what it is not. A thing cannot be itself, and not its...

Kelly Jones..............: Thank you, Mikiel, for taking the effort of piecing together a courteous and intelligent response. I declare the discussion finished. Again, fuck you very much. You can declare whatever you like. I have a few concluding remarks. KJ: I suppose the most interesting part of i...

I fucked up on the limit of three "embedded quotes" again, so i will chop off a few quote brackets and let the reader figure out who said what. Glad to see the new attention you are giving to your posts. They're easier to read, with clearer definitions. It also looks as if you're being a b...

m: As I have said often here, Oneness refers to the One Being Whose manifest body is the cosmos... "all things." On small scale the same is true. I am one person (being) composed of a multitude of parts. The question of "the One and the many" is resolved as above. Bump. Too simpl...

Your prose needs... remodeling ...but I accept your humble obeisances, Carl, knowing they really come from your heart. Going down on one knee before my majesty is good for you and good for me... My purpose, as you know, is to spark a cascade of effervescent bubblation in your soul, leading to susta...

Wolff's use of the word prior has nothing to do with a priori reasoning, Mikiel. As Wolff describes it, what is 'prior' is actually prior to a priori reasoning, although realisation of it necessarily comes afterwards: Thus, Consciousness is primary, i.e., it is first, prior to everything. Not befor...

Iolaus: I find the proposition that we have more dimensions extremely probable, and the difficulty of understanding the behaviors of quantum particles indicates that Planck length may actually be the gateway into another, smaller, inner dimension. Furthermore, you say you want to converse, yet you p...

once a "being" knows the Source (consciousness) in all, there is no more hierarchy of which beings are more conscious *of this unity* than others. Yet you, who claim to know the Source, wrote: If matter is not "sentient" it is not capable of greater consciousness of the Creator ...

It tickles me how so many of you here are so school-marm-ish about the technical correct-ness of grammar, punctuation and spelling (gps) here. You know my priorities on the above. So, again, you divert attention from the substance of the post to such (shall I say it again?... yes...) pedantic trivi...

The battle rages between evolution and creationism (now euphemized to "intelligent design.") I offer a succinct solution suggesting that the process of natural selection is intelligently designed by omnipresent consciousness manifesting locally in each form, individual and species.... and...

Brilliant, mikiel, and you are right, Alex can be such a pompous ass. Yes he can. And he can also write the most brilliant critique of the sorry state of logic-depedent pseudo-enlightenment as dogmatically 'enforced' by this little cult and swallowed by "believers" of the "QRS Philos...

Kelly, So you are not going to comment on the philosopy of consciousness without an object, either generically speaking or as the Path of Knowledge, Western style which is a major Western contribution to understanding enlightenment. You return again to your misconceptions i have already repeatedly a...

Mikiel wrote: "The process of natural selection IS intelligence responding adaptively to all situations. This is God (Consciousness) immanent in all forms of creation, including all individuals of all species." I hope the forum will acknowledge a perfectly constructed, perfectly punctuate...

The process of natural selection IS intelligence responding adaptively to all situations. This is God (Consciousness) immanent in all forms of creation, including all individuals of all species.

If everything is a manifestation of the same consciousness, why aren't they all experiencing the same intentions? Repetition # 99: Consciousness is omnipresent. It differentiates in the process of maniestation as/through the myraid of forms. Same Identity (One Being)... multitudes of varieties of m...