GENIUS FORUMS

I finally found your book (at least a preview). Turns out I didn't need any advanced Google-fu at all! A simple search of the title pulls it up. I was only making it harder for myself. It appears that you had the book listed on lulu and barnes and noble (perhaps others), and had since pulled it. Tha...

Well I did offer you to PM me. There's hardly a shortage of those that claim to be enlightened. Do you blame me for being skeptical? Not that I have much faith in what you have to offer based on how this thread is going, but again, if you'd like to share your book, you're more than welcomed. I'm not...

I'm going to move this over to "Worldly Matters".

Short answer, most people that throw out the "racist" card are too ignorant to have a rational discussion with in the first place.

Russell, The opposites are not so much one in the same but definitely co-dependent. Existence is divided into two opposites, one contains all positive energy and one contains all negative energy. This physical plane is where negative and positive human energy potential are being separated. I unders...

It's not so much that I disagree with Quinn but the common definition of reality is the acceptance of the physical dimension as such. I see. And I agree. What Quinn meant by reality both considers and goes beyond the physical dimension. It is sometimes referred to as Ultimate Reality around here. I...

By the third paragraph of David Quinn's introduction, he falls into deep error. The paramount importance of an understanding of reality is not even close. Life is based in energy. Energy is perpetual. Prior to physical form, all things existed in potential energy. After physical form, all things co...

Hello SR, thanks for stopping by. I have written a book, called "Navigating Perpetual Existence." The first chapter is posted below. The book is for those that seek to achieve enlightenment, rather than discuss it. I'm looking for a handful of such people to read the book, in exchange for ...

Automation increases freedom. What will we do with such freedom? Are we heading towards Idiocracy ? Endless entertainment is but a mere click or tap away. The opportunity to devolve into a simple-minded, hedonistic lifestyle has never been easier. On the other hand, we live in a time where informati...

Men are not simply foolish, they are potential. Women, in their femininity, have no need for wisdom. Wisdom is the means by which man discovers and reclaims his independent, spiritual completion. That is what women desire most in a man. Spirit is reality, so all things are spiritual. If wisdom is t...

She does indeed mold herself by the image he presents, but only because she can sense the higher quality of ideology and structure behind his actions, which she can never fully reproduce. No. Woman in reciprocation to Man's projection delivers him appearance, which is the substance of all the reali...

Very interesting. Of course, science will never die. Instead, it appears that we will rely on AI tech to assist in, or take over, science more than ever in the future. It reminds me of bitcoin, which IMO will continue to grow, eventually massively, as more people learn to trust it. Perhaps even more...

In the abstract this is the most clear to see. And the process is unavoidable once it's seen that in reality the two can never really meet, unless it's in some ritualized, fantasized setting, like a stage play. This is all the easier if one starts embodying the other, mimicking as it were. Of cours...

As I read through the comments and think about it more, it becomes apparent to me that androgyny exists within reality in an infinitude of ways, within scopes of all sizes. I'm going to retract my offered definition of androgyny and instead leave it as is, originally. Androgyny is the combination, o...

The biggest problem with the "men are masculine, women are feminine" paradigm is that it ignores the fact that women are incredibly masculine. In fact, they are the second most masculine creatures on earth. As individuals, men and women are both masculine (internally subjective). Indeed, i...

Feminism is ideologically & intellectually amorphous. It fits into whatever niche is available. *cough* androgyny *cough* For example, if feminists cared about socialist doctrine, they wouldn't be bothered about serving in national armies. Nor would they focus their attention on attaining power...

A bit more on androgyny. The natural hierarchy of the family unit ascends from the child, to the mother, to the father (beneath children are pets, and above man is God). The child submits its will to the parents, and the wife to the husband. As the woman is sandwiched in between the two, she must be...

Not really, especially considering the sheer quantity and complexity of the actual subject. But I would say that male leaders usually don't believe their own BS (Trump & Bernie as champions of the disenfranchised), whereas feminine leaders do (Hillary as preferred candidate of sane humans). I'l...

To me that sounds more like an attempt to equate process with state or outcome. Which to some extent is true enough. But at the essence masculinity never finds peace if we'd define its nature as restlessness of the eternal, to stay in tune with Kierkegaard's idea of essential Christianity. That bri...

Hey Diebs, The masculine then as a more unsettled and restless mode? Extremes, higher and lower ways to climb or sink would be the consequence of some higher degree of general dumbness, dreaming, off-beat behavior: a kind of deviant pattern which when left unchecked usually would lead to utter stupi...

Androgyny is normally defined to be the combination, or blending, of the feminine and masculine, in physicality and/or behavior. For the sake of this discussion, I offer a variation to definition: Androgyny: The blending of, or the lack of distinction between, subject and object. Furthermore, from t...

Russell, I know quite enough of what this forums [collective conscious] is about. My question; I have expected is clear enough for the learned. If you do not know, ask - I'll pleasantly elucidate. This forum is not about "collective conscious". If you disagree, please elaborate on what yo...

Hello Infinitemultiverse, thanks for stopping by. Sorry for the late response. On god, as it could have been, may be, or can be. I do not disbelieve or believe per say. I only lack credible evidence, or see only such. So we should visit the bible. I see it as a collection of stories. Most, if not al...

Hi Galadriel. This forum isn't focused on the quantity of knowledge but the quality of it, based on how grounded one's understanding of reality is, in relation to the goal of spiritual enlightenment. One does not need to read copious amounts of material in order to become genius, only enough to assi...

Hey there Trevor, thanks for sharing. I think it should be mentioned that models like this can be helpful as long as it respected as merely a model to assist further understanding, rather than a guideline to adhere to as gospel. Besides that, for fun, I'd like to have a go at this and give my own sh...

Hi TD, welcome to the board. Been browsing Menoftheinfinite youtube channel, saw a video about Friends and Ego. Dan Rowden's I think. Do you mean this one ? I firmly believe society needs to see these videos, because they are vital components to a functioning mind. These videos taught me not to beli...