GENIUS FORUMS

Bloody Nora!
the only thing you supply is causes/conditions commentary.

fair enough?

In that.

experiencing that.

being that.

Supplier.

you can read a brochure concerning a Ferrari. Study the specs diligently. etc... That is not the direct experience Ferrari. The abstract 'emptiness/dependent arising' in 2 dimensional written/spoken form is not the direct experience. Being inside the abstract experiencing it is the direct experience...

You might notice playin' the 'suffering card' generates widespread approval.
Playin' the 'bliss card' is called a lie and insane.

The belief in inherent existence exceedingly popular.

well, you know 'correct view' is up for grabs. that's all. when subjectivity is mentioned it sure looks like 'affectivity'. there is a direct experience of 'correct view' producing a sense of wonder, ekstasis. no one owns it like no one owns hunger. complete objectivity not I, me, mine. the idea of ...

That is dependent arising.

dependent origination.

bodies eat each other, body thang.
completely objective.
recycle depot.
what's on the menu?

little cloud scudding.

If spirit is only objective, how do you explain our different views on subjectively? conceptualising mind. the only thing you dish up is causes/conditions affirming dependent arising. the logic is if it is dependently arisen it is vapour, smoke and mirrors, phantom-like, appearance, dreamscape. Not...

form is empty.
empty is empty.

cannot be refuted.

take a bex and lie down.

There's a realization that they are not really separate. It's one experience, one action, one life. Whatever one might say or think about it! What remains is achieving clarity by removing the image of any mirror: removing notions of inherent difference between world, body and mind -- just like remo...

It's a Story about ego.
Word picture.
not direct experience.
Literature.
Conceptualising mind.

Literary philosophers.
house of language.

direct experience
oh okay, we'll talk about it (house of language).
not the direct experience.

This translation is my favourite: "He who knows other men is discerning; he who knows himself is intelligent. He who overcomes others is strong; he who overcomes himself is mighty. He who is satisfied with his lot is rich; he who goes on acting with energy has a firm will. He who does not fail ...

Your definition of subjectivity is unknown to me

correct.
that's the point.
to think that spirit is otherwise than completely objective.
gosh.

The notion of subjectivity presupposes we 'invented' our own brain and blood cells etc.
unpacking subjectivity and all that entails.

Kunga, Yes. And I am trying my best to be a useful tool at this forum The key is not to argue that there are independent objects that mean different things 'depending on the context'. The crucial point is that at any given moment, every tool is plugged into cer­tain limited systems of machinery whil...

here we go again. what is supplied is causes/conditions. you do not say anything else. that affirms dependent arising. every mind/body machine operates from it. bells and whistles, pulleys and levers. a cartoon. biffo, bumpo. the belief in inherent existence. yin and yang is your weapon Pam. you ass...

It's your failure in comprehension. it's empty and meaningless that it's empty and meaningless. you provide the meaning. making a meaning a possibility for existence, enrolment. conceptualising mind. an idea. conceptualising mind generates environment, bodies, activities, pleasures, sorrows. all phe...

Wow!
it looks like ya'll broke thru'.
the wondrous groundlessness
the ineffable silence
astonishing.
a thrilling love for being.
bliss.
object-oriented.

Spirit
Mind
Body

here we go again. what's been provided is causes/conditions which affirms dependent arising. what is dependently arisen doesn't exist from it's own side, under it's own steam, lacks inherent existence. it is empty of an own self. belief in inherent existence of phenomena is the cause of suffering. d...

you've given me causes/conditions again.
what can be deduced from that?
dependent arising.
logic dictates empty of self.

Well, you know, if it's dependent arising, logic dictates it is disinherited of 'selfhood'.

ain't on the throne.

it's empty and meaningless that it's empty and meaningless.
you provide the meaning.
enrolment in something.

dead set certainty.

I foresaw you could only write or speak causes/conditions thus affirming dependent arising.
cannot be refuted.

uncanny.

emptiness/bliss.
wonderfulness.

Bobo wrote:Then, there is not where it is coming from.

That form?
An idea?
tool-being.

You contradicted yourself there.

Causes/conditions.
dependent arising.
you can't say anything else.
cannot be refuted.

don't say you weren't warned.

Buddha mind is a condition.
In order to for the sake of.
tool-being.