GENIUS FORUMS

they are not relative to the statement and question I put before you. Relativity does not contradict nor ascertain anything, If relativity cannot ascertain anything, then what can be ascertained relative to your statement and question? By taking away the 'if' you keep attempting to make relative to...

The issue here is not who, but what. What's the difference? We can't have who without what nor what without who. How can you know what what is if you don't know what who is? If I am I because you are you, and you are you because I am I, then I am not I and you are not you. So who is asking the ques...

Should it be without contradiction thus with absoluteness, what is the medium for your existence before your birth? Who is asking the question and to whom is it being asked? Answer that and you'll have your answer. The issue here is not who, but what. Surely logic and reasoning comes to one to answ...

Hi Serendipper!!! :D This is a question I ran into on another forum, and the question was jumped over by most of the participants who were asked, and those who did answer were similar to yours. As you will note the question ask: "What is the difference between evolving and expanding consciousn...

Pam states: Self is a concept. SELF is also a concept. Just as life is a concept and tree is a concept and abortion is a concept. Now when these concepts come together in 'languaging', the self or 'life of the self' is formed. There are not two selves, an invisible 'real' self and a visible 'imitat...

Hi Serendipper!!! This is a question I ran into on another forum, and the question was jumped over by most of the participants who were asked, and those who did answer were similar to yours. As you will note the question ask: "What is the difference between evolving and expanding consciousness?...

Is existence the only category by which one comes to an understanding of a thing? What about the view that existence is relative? For instance, this text exists relative to the digital universe. Speaking of existence abstractly doesn't seem to have much meaning given that we're always left with the...

Is existence the only category by which one comes to an understanding of a thing? What about the view that existence is relative? For instance, this text exists relative to the digital universe. Speaking of existence abstractly doesn't seem to have much meaning given that we're always left with the...

Very thought provoking conversation. Psychologically the path taken by the participants evoke, to me the questions: What is the difference between evolving and expanding consciousness? And does the Self stimulate past memories of association contemporary or eons ago? And finally, what define Self, o...

Surely the words of Glenn Gould are acknowledged here, for "In the dimension of time, invention of man's reality, regardless of fears loneliness, guilt, or whatever reason ascribe is duplicitous. . .to create there must be a vision, a blueprint." And "when a blueprint is handed to us ...

Nothing can be proved to another person. it is impossible because there are no two people, or objects, or events identical in form, opinion, nor their intake of the five (5) senses And as another poster stated, definition must be the drawing point for a beginning for a writer or painter to produce a...

The individual viewpoint is the illusion. Using quotes to support this truth is not a breach of truth telling. If this is the truth, then the individual POV stating the quote is also an illusion, down to the statement of a breach. There are no other people whose backs can be ridden. There is only l...

The enlightening question that needs asking here is "how can I be deep and step into me when I am here and no where else?" The questions you ask above arise out of ignorance of your true identity as the infinite causality. There can be no enlightening question to be asked when you cannot ...

Why do people have the desire to talk? Been reading as this conversation has continued, and as of yet I find the answer to the question in the above quote has eluded all who has participated. What I have discovered, in many words, truth as correctness, in this conversation has been morphed into tru...

1. It could be said is not an acknowledgment of control. The infinite does think and speak as it analyzes. This is all that is being presented in these four words. 2. Since there is no inherent or separate self in the analysis of the things of God/The Causality, control of one self or mind on anoth...

Pam declares: it's all about experiencing truth for oneself. I believe it is important to add that while the reason for existence cannot be known, truths about the nature of existence can be known (realized). And that for many, including me, it is because of these realizations about the nature of ex...

Good morning JohnJ. I appreciate your response to my post, and even your replacement of the word 'creation' for the word 'life' in this matter. However, to void a direct word(s) to mean what is partial to you, you must distinguish the sameness of such substitution by a logical foundation which you h...

There was no need, but I re-read my words to find where I stated, or even indicated one understand life, but found no such wording as you have stated I wrote about understanding life. Perhaps I have overlooked this statement and should I have, then I will acknowledge my saying of such. Nonetheless, ...

Pam stated: I do not see any attempt, either in the commentary or in my posts that suggests an attempt to 'place all selves into a path they deem must be followed if stability of consciousness is to become a reality for mankind that because the commentary, and your words Truth must be analyzed for o...

I have been reading the conversation between you Pam and JohnJ, and, from my reading, find the both of you standing at a line drawn in the sands but neither can crossover for lack of determining whether consciousness or awareness constitutes the 'I' consciousness. To ask for reasoning which defines ...

Pam states" Truth must be analyzed for oneself. which is what I have stated in my post concerning what The Buddha did. And of course the Wisdom text's are pointers to discovery(whether considered as truth, or impulses nudging one to say I never thought of it that way). All life's events are poi...

For me, I find the Abhidhamma text, from what I read "is the Higher Teaching of the Buddha. " It expounds the quintessence of His profound doctrine and deals with the Ultimate Truth." There is the rub, for it is of the Buddha's (applicable directly only to Him by experience, which can...

Physical Creation Consider the birth of a human being, for example. the parents would constitute the main "cause" of the child, while space would merely be a "background condition". The latter would be relegated to its lowly status because, although it is necessary for the child...

jufa, you said "to this writer" but your words, to this listener, did not match this declaration of individual attachment. Perhaps I misheard, perhaps my words to your ear suffered the same fate, such is the nature of the conditioned, relative thinking life. For me, our dialogue provided ...

Quote jufa: To this writer it is about being Sacred, or true to ones self without attachment to a church, organization, community, country, or nation which project an idea which makes ones soul cry, upon becoming aware of. Cry because ones soul knows if such projections and ideas were the truth of ...