GENIUS FORUMS

This is a faulty conclusion on your behalf. Strong logic yields the same conclusion.i.e. an infinite, boundless omniverse, You completely missed that point. Calling something a "theory" is not a conclusion at all. Scientists call the omniverse a theory only because there isn't enough empi...

Scientists have reached the same conclusion via logic as well. The only difference is that they called it a theory, rather than an absolute truth. The important thing to remember is that it is the mechanism of logic which yields the same conclusion. Only weak logic would conclude that it is just a ...

I still don't understand why you seem to display what appears to be an anti-science bias, when, in fact, modern scientific theory seems to confirm your philosophies at every turn. "The Omniverse", a term which is gradually replacing "universe", acknowledges a boundless, infinite...

But my original point was that you cannot know the universe had no beginning. By using logic, reasoning, and just a touch of science, modern cosmologists have argued that the univese did in fact have a beginning. They can't know, either, by the way. Here you're defining "universe" as a th...