GENIUS FORUMS

But swan, just because one may have more intellectual capacity than another, that does not give one the right to exploit others to excessive labour and toil especially when the genius could be doing those very tasks for himself. Yes it does give me the right, if I'm able to exploit them it means I ...

A man without emotion is not a man, a wise man has to have emotion but he can enter an "emotionless state of mind" to evaluate reality.

Emotion is the prime impulse to do anything, nothing it's done out of pure logic, even then something must have made the logic "move".

Swan wrote: On over population mmmm as long as i have food for me why should I care about some uneducated and almost barbaric being dying? I suspect humanity is moving in a direction where the strong are no longer dependent on the slave labour of the weak. If we are dependent on the slave labour of...

Problem is in how we're defining strong and weak... Who is strong? the smart? well then only 2-5% of the world population would have the right to live. My point is that the strong need the weak to hold their position, only in an uthopy we would be all strong, we need "mental slaves" that d...

Chadwick Stone wrote:The Illuminati? The Freemasons? Those are conspiracy THEORIES, Teslacoils. How does *THAT* pertain to your original post?

Please don't use Theory for these paranoid-lefwinged thoughts, they're hypothesis :P , Theory it's a hypothesis that has been proven to certain degree i.e. Quamtum Theory.

R. Steven Coyle wrote:tesla,

What are your thoughts on Go?

may I add shogi?

I.Q= Intelligence Quotient Intelligence in the more mundane meaning it's the aptitude to be able to link what you know to a new situation. Meassuring Inteligence would be equal to meassuring your memories, therefore I.Q. would oscilate depending on how much you know about something. But the point of...

We cannot compare Men with Women, the same way we can't compare the land with the sea. You can't say women>men or viceversa, because first of all we're anatomically different, the body of women works with many different hormones that mens' does, that's why sometimes we might say that women "get...

Swan wrote: I'm not quite sure what you mean, I can’t think of an example, can you? However, any thought itself, could be considered as a matter of natures survival. Nature, however perfect from the Totality point of view, apparently survives through trials and errors, and in the wake, it does le...

Andreas wrote: Let's not forget to keep in mind that this identity-maintenance propelled, uh, 'wisdom', has the world to do with sucking golf balls through garden hoses, though. If this is what you believe, why don’t you actually finish the post with a well-thought out argument? Instead of just j...

Personally I rather live in this civilization than in any other reasons: 1- Healthcare: I won't simply die because of flu or appendicitis. 2- Knowledge: let's face it we have access to thousands of books, millions of web pages and each day knowledge multiplies, without that knowledge we wouldn't be ...

Swan wrote: Ecstasy by itself is neutral: is it overwhelming joy something that defines a genius? or something that goes agaisnt it's character? i believe it doesn't. The "issues" with ecstasy would be: how you get it? Ecstasy gotten by hurting the spirit and hindering the awareness of se...

Do we need fancy protocol to express our ideas and to discuss things? i believe not. Is it useful? well, only if it's synergical. Wouldn't the civility parameters confine our ability and right to share ideas? I believe that aslong as we can share thoughts and get something out of this conversations,...

Ecstasy by itself is neutral: is it overwhelming joy something that defines a genius? or something that goes agaisnt it's character? i believe it doesn't. The "issues" with ecstasy would be: how you get it? Ecstasy gotten by hurting the spirit and hindering the awareness of self could be c...