GENIUS FORUMS

There might be some cultural differences in the seductions, but at bottom I think their functioning has always been the same. Including things like dowry systems and arranged marriages? Arranged marriage isn't a seduction, and I'm guessing a dowry system isn't either, whatever that is. That's what ...

There might be some cultural differences in the seductions, but at bottom I think their functioning has always been the same. Including things like dowry systems and arranged marriages? Your water analogy is very good, and I would definitely say that water would be more pleasurable for me if I had ...

David Quinn wrote:You could switch them off at least.

You could have it set so that it automatically switches off everyone over sixty years old.

You want higher risk and pain in a sex simulation? Just add a nice little electric shock to the testicles whenever the player fails. Simple. Maybe you could sync it with visuals of the woman inflicting a kick to the crotch.

Indeed. As any experienced seducer will tell us, the chase is the main game and the biggest thrill of sex. The actual physical act at the end is almost an anti-climax, a ritual that has to be got through. The woman has already submitted, the game has already been won. It will be interesting to see ...

Time is hardly innocent, it's killed untold millions.

brokenhead wrote:Anagram Server is a great link for killing time.

The concept of killing time depresses me. It seems so aimless and passionless. (Sorry, I don't mean to bring you down, I found those anagrams surprisingly amusing.)

Well, how bout just looking into online personals. The penis to pussy ratio seeking casual sex seems very high, potentially driving up your stock and bargaining power massively! Plentyoffish.com Jason, you have got to be kidding me. What gave you the impression that any man can do the job for me? N...

Check out this revolutionary new keyboardless laptop from Apple.(YouTube video)

Okay. Jane comes across Tarzan one morning with his dick in a knothole, banging the tree. She says "Nooooo, Tarzan, here" as she lays down and points to her crotch. Tarzan comes over, takes a look, and then gives Jane's crotch a couple of hard swats. "Owwww," says Jane. "Wh...

You could probably easily get free no maintenance micromanaged sex from some random guy. Please explain how. I'd be all for it. Well, how bout just looking into online personals. The penis to pussy ratio seeking casual sex seems very high, potentially driving up your stock and bargaining power mass...

[laughs] Hey, Jason. I get this image of you walking around with a nuclear powered, pygmy-high half human, half AI strapped to your arse all day as you tend to your genetically modified fruit and vegetable gardens and copious notes re same... Now I think you're really getting me. Although, to be pi...

Well, the way it is right now is all part of the thrill for me, ya know? Nothing hotter than the chase, the pent up sexual frustration trying to make it [you know, it] last, etc... I'll bet that's the same kind of thing cavemen said, when referring to the fact their food came from the often lethal ...

The point of what?

I don't know, the idea of machinery has never done it for me. It either has to be live, pulsing flesh or nothing at all, man. No compromise. For many it's simply the physical sensations that the machine generates that are desirable, the machine is just a tool to that end, there is no desire for the...

David Quinn wrote:Without the male desire to conquer his ideation of woman, sex would become mundane and uninteresting - akin to relieving one's bladder in the toilet.

Heavenly bodily pleasure rising to an intense crescendo, sans any relation to women, would not be mundane and uninteresting.

My guess is that modern Western society and conditioning generally tends to have more of a negative rather than positive impact on sexual preference in this sense. That is, it eliminates potential sexual avenues as opposed to cultivating specific avenues like heterosexuality. It forces limitations....

It boils down to this: If you could give me a machine that could inflict upon me all the physical sensations (pressure, friction, thrusting, sucking, and whatever else) that the right man could, I'd go for the machine and forget about the man, if for no other reason that because the machine is chea...

As Cory noted, it is quite possible that there are innate elements to sexual preference. I think perhaps this notion of projecting ideals onto women is being overplayed, especially since we're talking about sex - it's just bodies rubbing against each other and animal desire. I don't know about that...

Why don't I feel the same hunger when I see a cabbage as I do with a piece of chocolate? Because they taste different. How, in a physical sense, is fucking a woman's vagina different from fucking a man's lubed up asshole? There are still basic visual, tactile and auditory differences(which can be c...

Dan Rowden wrote:One has to protect the innocent - and the foolish. Blame the Russians.

Awww but it was funny.

Dan Rowden wrote:In a sense, actually, yes.

What sense exactly?

Why don't I feel the same hunger when I see a cabbage as I do with a piece of chocolate? Is it because I am projecting my ideals onto the chocolate?

You don't think when a guy sees a pretty girl all those physical facts don't disappear in a cloud of ideational vapour? Cloud of ideational vapour? My experience seems about the exact opposite of that. The basic animal sexual lust I experience when seeing an attractive woman is not something I'd de...

Simply to allow for induction and prediction there must be something occurring from moment to moment. What is this something? See, this is what you are missing. You are still thinking in the 19th-century way. Consider this: To allow for relativistic measurements, there must still be something to me...

I wonder if the guy who swore him in still has a job today. MSNBC: Roberts and Obama seal deal, with a stumble Obama was one of 22 Senate Democrats to vote against Roberts' confirmation to the Supreme Court in 2005 — the first time a Supreme Court justice has sworn in a president who voted against ...